FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75  
76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   >>  
rity, that Mr. Blount's chamber was in Fig Tree Court, on the back side of the Inner Temple Hall, London, his country residence being at Orlton. From his correspondence with Sir William, it appears that he rendered him much assistance in his works. J. B. WHITBORNE. _Pronunciations of "Coke" and "Cowper"_ (Vols. iv. and v. _passim_; Vol. vi., p. 16.).--So much, and so well to the purpose, has already been said in "N. & Q.," in support of the averment that the former of these names was originally pronounced _Cook_, that it may appear needless to adduce additional evidence; still, considering the source from which the testimony I am now bringing forward is derived, I think I may stand excused for recurring to the subject. It is from the Court Books of the manor of Mitcham (the birthplace of Sir Edward Coke), and from the parochial registers; in which, and, indeed, in all cotemporary records where sound was followed in the spelling, I find the name of this family written {604} _Cook_ or _Cooke_. The great Sir Edward's own baptismal register is thus entered--1551, Feb. 7. "Edward Cooke genero." Surely this is conclusive. The same pronunciation was vulgarly followed almost up to the present time. There must be many who remember at the Norfolk elections the cry of "Cook for ever," as well as that of the opposite political party who threw up their caps for _Woodhouse_; for so _Wodehouse_ was in like manner pronounced. Again, the Hobarts, another Norfolk family, were always called _Hubbarts_; and more anciently Bokenham, _Buckenham_, Todenham, _Tuddenham_, and others I could name, showing that in the Norfolk dialect the usage was in pronunciation to soften the _o_. Now as regards the sound of Cowper, the same class of authorities, old deeds, court rolls, and parish registers, appears to lead to a different conclusion from that of your other correspondents. We have now no _Cowper_ family of Norfolk origin; of _Coopers_ we have multitudes: the names of whose forefathers were written _Couper_ or _Cowper_; and if written as pronounced, the analogical inference is that the original pronunciation was _Cowper_, Cooper being merely the modern way of spelling; and curiously enough, the parish of _Hoo_, in this county, is called and now usually spelt _How_. G. A. C. _Unkid_ (Vol. viii., p. 353.).--_Unketh_, _uncouth_, are different writings of the same word. Jamieson has _uncoudy_, which he explains, dreary; and _coudy_, i. e. c
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75  
76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   >>  



Top keywords:
Cowper
 

Norfolk

 

pronounced

 

Edward

 

pronunciation

 

written

 
family
 
called
 

parish

 
spelling

registers

 

appears

 
soften
 

dialect

 

showing

 

Blount

 

authorities

 

Tuddenham

 
Bokenham
 
Woodhouse

Wodehouse

 

political

 
opposite
 
manner
 

anciently

 

Buckenham

 

Hubbarts

 
Hobarts
 

chamber

 

Todenham


correspondents

 

Unketh

 

county

 

uncouth

 
dreary
 

explains

 
writings
 

Jamieson

 
uncoudy
 

origin


Coopers

 

multitudes

 

elections

 
forefathers
 

modern

 

curiously

 

Cooper

 

original

 

Couper

 
analogical