FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108  
109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   >>   >|  
a well-set ring may ornament an aristocratic finger, (though aristocratic fingers, like aristocratic hands, as Byron observes, need no ornament to tell their origin,) who but an Otaheitan would admire the application of them to the gouty toes of some "fine old English gentleman?" Usefulness first, then, and ornament afterwards; think first of what you actually want for your health or comfort; cut your coat upon that pattern, clap on your lace afterwards; but enrich it only to improve its appearance, not to interfere with, to conceal, or to alter its original destination. To begin, however, methodically, let us take what are commonly understood by well-dressed English people of the present day, and let us criticise them from top to toe. And first, then, of a gentleman's head--_le chef_, as the French call it--and the _chapeau_, its present gear. What a covering! what a termination to the capital of that pillar of the creation, Man! what an ungraceful, mis-shapen, useless, and uncomfortable appendage to the seat of reason--the brain-box! Does it protect the head from either heat, cold, or wet? Does it set off any of natural beauty of the human cranium? Are its lines in harmony with, or in becoming contrast to, the expressive features of the face? Is it comfortable, portable, durable, or cheap? What qualities, either of use or ornament, has it in its favour that it should be the crowning point of a well-dressed man's toilet? The hat is, beyond all doubt, one of the strangest vestimental anomalies of the nineteenth century. The history of the hat is this:--The simplest covering for a man's head after his own unshorn locks--(do not remind us of the matted and _living_ locks of the Indians or Hottentots)--must have been something like the Greek skull-cap. This we hold to have been the root, or nucleus, of the hat; and yet even this cap had a fault in point of utility, for it failed to shadow the eyes: and on the earliest Greek monuments we find a cap with a wide brim appended, or a flattish straw-hat following close upon the Phrygian bonnet. A light flattish hat has its recommendation in a warm country, but it will not do for the winds and storms of a northern clime; and hence all the old Gauls, the northern nations, the Tartars, and the peasants of Europe, for many a long century wore a modified cap--sometimes swelling out into ornamental proportions, at others shrinking into the primitive simplicity of the Phrygian or
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108  
109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
ornament
 

aristocratic

 

century

 
covering
 

flattish

 

Phrygian

 

present

 

dressed

 
English
 
northern

gentleman

 

Hottentots

 

remind

 

Indians

 

living

 

matted

 

strangest

 

toilet

 

crowning

 
favour

vestimental
 

anomalies

 
simplest
 

history

 

nineteenth

 

qualities

 

unshorn

 
Tartars
 
nations
 

peasants


Europe
 

storms

 

shrinking

 

primitive

 

simplicity

 

proportions

 

ornamental

 

modified

 

swelling

 

country


utility

 

failed

 

shadow

 
nucleus
 

earliest

 

monuments

 

bonnet

 

recommendation

 

durable

 

appended