FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74  
75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   >>   >|  
nto the state of the language at the periods when the various pieces were written. Alter them in any degree, even the slightest, and you destroy the intrinsic character of the composition. 'In making his compilation from the Bannatyne MSS.,' continued Lord Hailes, 'Ramsay has omitted some stanzas and added others, has modernised the versification and varied the ancient mode of spelling.' To offend thus was to render himself liable to the severest censure from all literary antiquarians. The fault was as inexcusable as would be a trader's in palming off shoddy goods as those of the best materials. As an example of the ruthless liberties our poet took with the text, it may be well to follow Chalmers' example, and print side by side a stanza of Ramsay's 'paraphrase' and Lord Hailes' severely accurate rendering of the opening of Dunbar's 'Thistle and the Rose'-- _Ramsay._ 'Quhen Merch with variand winds was overpast, And sweet Apryle had with his silver showers Tane leif of Nature with an orient blast, And lusty May, that mudder is of flowrs, Had maid the birds begin the tymous hours; Amang the tendir odours reid and quhyt, Quhois harmony to heir was grit delyt.' _Hailes._ 'Quhen Merche wes with variand windis past, And Appryll had with her silver shouris Tane leif at Nature with ane orient blast, And lusty May, that mudder is of flouris, Had maid the birdis to begyn thair houris Amang the tendir odouris reid and quhyt, Quhois harmony to heir it wis delyt.' In Dunbar's 'Lament for the Deth of the Makkaris' he not only varied but added several lines, and these in the silliest manner possible. For example, at the conclusion of Dunbar's noble elegy, Ramsay must needs tack on three stanzas, as a prophecy by Dunbar himself, wherein the vanity-full poet is introduced as 'a lad frae Hethermuirs.' What censure could be too strong for inappropriate fooling like the following, coming in to mar the solemn close of Dunbar's almost inspired lines?-- 'Suthe I forsie, if spaecraft had, Frae Hether-muirs sall rise a lad, Aftir two centries pas, sall he Revive our fame and memorie: Then sal we flourish _evirgrene_; All thanks to careful Bannatyne, And to the patron kind and frie Wha lends the lad baith them and me. Far sall we fare baith eist and west, Owre ilka clime by Scots possest; Then sen our
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74  
75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Dunbar

 

Ramsay

 

Hailes

 

silver

 

variand

 
harmony
 

Quhois

 

orient

 

Nature

 

censure


mudder
 

tendir

 

stanzas

 

Bannatyne

 

varied

 

vanity

 

introduced

 
fooling
 

inappropriate

 

strong


prophecy

 

Hethermuirs

 

pieces

 

Makkaris

 

Lament

 

silliest

 
coming
 
manner
 

conclusion

 
patron

careful

 

flourish

 

evirgrene

 
possest
 

forsie

 

spaecraft

 

solemn

 

odouris

 
inspired
 

Hether


Revive

 

memorie

 

language

 

centries

 

periods

 

modernised

 
versification
 
ruthless
 

liberties

 

ancient