FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159  
160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   >>  
ended defense was thus bluntly stated by the German Premier: We are now in a state of necessity and necessity knows no law. Our troops have occupied Luxemburg and perhaps are already on Belgian soil. _Gentlemen, that is contrary to the dictates of international law._ It is true that the French Government has declared at Brussels that France is willing to respect the neutrality of Belgium, so long as her opponent respects it. We knew, however, that France stood ready for invasion. _France could wait, but we could not wait._ A French movement upon our flank upon the lower Rhine might have been disastrous. So we were compelled to override the _just protest_ of the Luxemburg and Belgian Governments. _The wrong--I speak openly--that we are committing_ we will endeavor to make good as soon as our military goal has been reached. Anybody who is threatened, as we are threatened, and is fighting for his highest possessions, can only have one thought--how he is to hack his way through. It will be noted that on this occasion, when above all other occasions it was not only the duty, but to the highest interests of Germany, to give to the world any substantial reason for violating the neutrality of Belgium, the defense of Germany is rested upon the ground of self-interest,--euphemistically called "necessity,"--_and upon none other_. While von Bethmann-Hollweg's statement does state that "France held herself in readiness to invade Belgium," there was no intimation that France had done so, or had any immediate intention of doing so. On the contrary, it was added, "_France could wait, we (Germany) could not._" If Belgium had forfeited its rights by undue favors to France or England, _why did the Chancellor characterize its protest as "just"?_ How Germany fulfilled the promise of its Chancellor, to "make good" the admitted wrong which it did Belgium, subsequent events have shown. It may be questioned whether, since the Thirty Years' War, any country has been subjected to such general devastating horrors. So little effort has been taken by the conqueror to lessen the inevitable suffering, that fines have been levied upon this impoverished people, which would be oppressive even in a period of prosperity. It is announced from Holland, as this book goes to press, that Germany has imposed upon this war-desolated country a fine of $7,000,000 per month a
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159  
160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   >>  



Top keywords:

France

 
Belgium
 

Germany

 

necessity

 

defense

 

country

 
Chancellor
 
threatened
 

highest

 

protest


French

 

contrary

 

Belgian

 

neutrality

 

Luxemburg

 
rights
 

Bethmann

 
Hollweg
 

forfeited

 

England


favors

 

Holland

 

desolated

 
intimation
 

invade

 

readiness

 

intention

 

imposed

 
statement
 

announced


people

 

impoverished

 
general
 

levied

 

called

 

subjected

 
devastating
 
horrors
 

lessen

 

suffering


inevitable
 

conqueror

 

effort

 

oppressive

 

subsequent

 

events

 

admitted

 
promise
 

fulfilled

 
prosperity