FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   >>  
hing is the extent of snow that was marked that after a while another kangaroo was added. But the marks were in single lines. My own acceptance is that not less than a thousand one-legged kangaroos, each shod with a very small horseshoe, could have marked that snow of Devonshire. London _Times_, Feb 16, 1855: "Considerable sensation has been caused in the towns of Topsham, Lymphstone, Exmouth, Teignmouth, and Dawlish, in Devonshire, in consequence of the discovery of a vast number of foot tracks of a most strange and mysterious description." The story is of an incredible multiplicity of marks discovered in the morning of Feb. 8, 1855, in the snow, by the inhabitants of many towns and regions between towns. This great area must of course be disregarded by Prof. Owen and the other correlators. The tracks were in all kinds of unaccountable places: in gardens enclosed by high walls, and up on the tops of houses, as well as in the open fields. There was in Lymphstone scarcely one unmarked garden. We've had heroic disregards but I think that here disregard was titanic. And, because they occurred in single lines, the marks are said to have been "more like those of a biped than of a quadruped"--as if a biped would place one foot precisely ahead of another--unless it hopped--but then we have to think of a thousand, or of thousands. It is said that the marks were "generally 8 inches in advance of each other." "The impression of the foot closely resembles that of a donkey's shoe, and measured from an inch and a half, in some instances, to two and a half inches across." Or the impressions were cones in incomplete, or crescentic basins. The diameters equaled diameters of very young colts' hoofs: too small to be compared with marks of donkey's hoofs. "On Sunday last the Rev. Mr. Musgrave alluded to the subject in his sermon and suggested the possibility of the footprints being those of a kangaroo, but this could scarcely have been the case, as they were found on both sides of the Este. At present it remains a mystery, and many superstitious people in the above-named towns are actually afraid to go outside their doors after night." The Este is a body of water two miles wide. London _Times_, March 6, 1855: "The interest in this matter has scarcely yet subsided, many inquiries still being made into the origin of the footprints, which caused so much consternation upon the morning of the 8th ult. In addition
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   >>  



Top keywords:

scarcely

 

tracks

 
kangaroo
 

Lymphstone

 
morning
 

footprints

 
diameters
 

marked

 
caused
 

donkey


inches

 
thousand
 

Devonshire

 
London
 
single
 

closely

 

Sunday

 

impression

 

measured

 

alluded


subject
 

advance

 
Musgrave
 
crescentic
 

basins

 
incomplete
 

impressions

 

instances

 

resembles

 
equaled

compared
 

present

 
subsided
 

inquiries

 

matter

 
interest
 

addition

 

consternation

 

origin

 

generally


remains

 

sermon

 

suggested

 

possibility

 

mystery

 
superstitious
 

afraid

 

people

 

multiplicity

 
discovered