FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272  
273   274   >>  
pression that Development is an Autocracy of Successive Dominants--which are not final--but which approximate higher to individuality or self-ness, than do the human tropisms that irresponsibly correlate to them. Eddie reported a celestial object, from the Observatory at Grahamstown, South Africa. It was in 1890. The New Dominant was only heir presumptive then, or heir apparent but not obvious. The thing that Eddie reported might as well have been reported by a night watchman, who had looked up through an unplaced sewer pipe. It did not correlate. The thing was not admitted to _Monthly Notices_. I think myself that if the Editor had attempted to let it in--earthquake--or a mysterious fire in his publishing house. The Dominants are jealous gods. In _Nature_, presumably a vassal of the new god, though of course also plausibly rendering homage to the old, is reported a comet-like body, of Oct. 27, 1890, observed at Grahamstown, by Eddie. It may have looked comet-like, but it moved 100 degrees while visible, or one hundred degrees in three-quarters of an hour. See _Nature_, 43-89, 90. In _Nature_, 44-519, Prof. Copeland describes a similar appearance that he had seen, Sept. 10, 1891. Dreyer says (_Nature_, 44-541) that he had seen this object at the Armagh Observatory. He likens it to the object that was reported by Eddie. It was seen by Dr. Alexander Graham Bell, Sept. 11, 1891, in Nova Scotia. But the Old Dominant was a jealous god. So there were different observations upon something that was seen in November, 1883. These observations were Philistines in 1883. In the _Amer. Met. Jour._, 1-110, a correspondent reports having seen an object like a comet, with two tails, one up and one down, Nov. 10 or 12, 1883. Very likely this phenomenon should be placed in our expression upon torpedo-shaped bodies that have been seen in the sky--our data upon dirigibles, or super-Zeppelins--but our attempted classifications are far from rigorous--or are mere gropes. In the _Scientific American_, 50-40, a correspondent writes from Humacao, Porto Rico, that, Nov. 21, 1883, he and several other--persons--or persons, as it were--had seen a majestic appearance, like a comet. Visible three successive nights: disappeared then. The Editor says that he can offer no explanation. If accepted, this thing must have been close to the earth. If it had been a comet, it would have been seen widely, and the news would have been telegraphe
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272  
273   274   >>  



Top keywords:

reported

 

Nature

 

object

 

Dominants

 

looked

 

attempted

 

Editor

 

correspondent

 
degrees
 
Observatory

observations

 

correlate

 
jealous
 

Grahamstown

 

persons

 

Dominant

 

appearance

 
reports
 

Scotia

 
Alexander

Graham

 
Philistines
 

November

 

majestic

 

Visible

 

successive

 

nights

 

writes

 

Humacao

 

disappeared


widely
 

telegraphe

 
explanation
 

accepted

 

expression

 

torpedo

 

shaped

 

bodies

 

phenomenon

 

gropes


Scientific

 

American

 

rigorous

 

dirigibles

 

Zeppelins

 

classifications

 
watchman
 

presumptive

 

apparent

 

obvious