FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181  
182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   >>  
haughty, betrays want of confidence and it makes one's opponent sceptical about the reality of the act itself. Humility therefore is the key to quick success. I hope that every non-co-operationist will recognise the necessity of being humble and self-restrained. It is because so little is really required to be done because all of that little depends entirely upon ourselves that I have ventured the belief that Swaraj is attainable in less than one year. SOME QUESTIONS ANSWERED "I write to thank you for yours of the 7th instant and especially for your request that I should after reading your writings in "Young India" on non-co-operation, give a full and frank criticism of them. I know that your sole desire is to find out the truth and to act accordingly, and hence I venture to make the following remarks. In the issue of May 5th you say that non-co-operation is "not even anti-Government." But surely to refuse to have anything to do with the Government to the extent of not serving it and of not paying its taxes is actually, if not theoretically anti-Government; and such a course must ultimately make all Government impossible. Again, you say, "It is the inherent right of a subject to refuse to assist a government that will not listen to him." Leaving aside the question of the ethical soundness of this proposition, may I ask which Government, in the present case? Has not the Indian Government done all it possibly can in the matter? Then if its attempts to voice the request of India should fail, would it be fair and just to do anything against it? Would not the proper course be non-co-operation with the Supreme Council of the Allies, including Great Britain, if it be found that the latter has failed properly to support the demand of the Indian Government and people? It seems to me that in all your writings and speeches you forget that in the present question both Government and people are as one, and if they fail to get what they justly want, how does the question of non-co-operation arise? Hindus and Englishmen and the Government are all at present "shouldering in a full-hearted manner the burden that Muhomedans of India are carrying etc. etc." But supposing we fail of our object--what then? Are we all to refuse to co-operate and with whom? Might I recommend the consideration of the following course of conduct? (1) "Wait and see" what the actual terms of the Treaty with Turkey are? (2) If they are not in accordan
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181  
182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   >>  



Top keywords:

Government

 

operation

 
refuse
 

question

 
present
 

people

 

request

 

Indian

 

writings

 

matter


object

 
attempts
 

supposing

 

proposition

 
soundness
 
ethical
 
Leaving
 

conduct

 

possibly

 
proper

operate
 

consideration

 

accordan

 

Council

 
forget
 
speeches
 

justly

 

hearted

 

Englishmen

 

Hindus


actual
 

manner

 

carrying

 

Britain

 

shouldering

 

Allies

 

including

 

Turkey

 

demand

 
burden

Treaty

 
support
 
recommend
 

failed

 

Muhomedans

 
properly
 

Supreme

 
surely
 

ventured

 
depends