FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42  
43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   >>   >|  
"blocked out" so far as it is necessary for stoping purposes with modern wide intervals between levels, and still be in blocks too large to warrant an assumption of continuity of values to their centers (Fig. 1). As to the third class of "possible" ore, it conveys an impression of tangibility to a nebulous hazard, and should never be used in connection with positive tonnages. This part of the mine's value comes under extension of the deposit a long distance beyond openings, which is a speculation and cannot be defined in absolute tons without exhaustive explanation of the risks attached, in which case any phrase intended to shorten description is likely to be misleading. [Illustration: Fig. 1.--Longitudinal section of a mine, showing classification of the exposed ore. Scale, 400 feet = 1 inch.] Therefore empirical expressions in terms of development openings cannot be made to cover a geologic factor such as the distribution of metals through a rock mass. The only logical basis of ore classification for estimation purposes is one which is founded on the chances of the values penetrating from the surface of the exposures for each particular mine. Ore that may be calculated upon to a certainty is that which, taking into consideration the character of the deposit, can be said to be so sufficiently surrounded by sampled faces that the distance into the mass to which values are assumed to extend is reduced to a minimum risk. Ore so far removed from the sampled face as to leave some doubt, yet affording great reason for expectation of continuity, is "probable" ore. The third class of ore mentioned, which is that depending upon extension of the deposit and in which, as said above, there is great risk, should be treated separately as the speculative value of the mine. Some expressions are desirable for these classifications, and the writer's own preference is for the following, with a definition based upon the controlling factor itself. They are:-- Proved Ore Ore where there is practically no risk of failure of continuity. Probable Ore Ore where there is some risk, yet warrantable justification for assumption of continuity. Prospective Ore Ore which cannot be included in the above classes, nor definitely known or stated in any terms of tonnage. What extent of openings, and therefore of sample faces, is required for the ore to
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42  
43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
continuity
 

deposit

 
openings
 

values

 
expressions
 
sampled
 
classification
 

distance

 

extension

 

purposes


assumption

 

factor

 

exposures

 

affording

 

surrounded

 

removed

 

calculated

 

reduced

 

consideration

 

extend


assumed

 

minimum

 

sufficiently

 

character

 
certainty
 
reason
 

taking

 

classifications

 

Prospective

 

included


classes

 
justification
 
warrantable
 

failure

 

Probable

 

sample

 

required

 

extent

 

stated

 
tonnage

practically
 
Proved
 

speculative

 

desirable

 
separately
 

treated

 

probable

 

mentioned

 

depending

 
surface