FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80  
81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   >>   >|  
gh old stopes, and thus more cheaply constructed than vertical shafts through solid rock; and also the case of mountainous topographic conditions mentioned above. [Illustration: Fig. 7.--Cross-section of inclined deposit which must be attacked in depth.] From an operating point of view, the bend in combined shafts (at _D_) gives rise to a good deal of wear and tear on ropes and gear. The possible speed of winding through a combined shaft is, however, greater than a simple incline, for although haulage speed through the incline section (_D F_) and around the bend of the combined shaft is about the same as throughout a simple incline (_A F_), the speed can be accelerated in the vertical portion (_D C_) above that feasible did the incline extend to the surface. There is therefore an advantage in this regard in the combined shaft. The net advantages of the combined over the inclined shaft depend on the comparative length of the two alternative routes from the intersection (_D_) to the surface. Certainly it is not advisable to sink a combined shaft to cut a deposit at 300 feet in depth if a simple incline can be had to the surface. On the other hand, a combined shaft cutting the deposit at 1,000 feet will be more advisable than a simple incline 2,000 feet long to reach the same point. The matter is one for direct calculation in each special case. In general, there are few instances of really deep-level projects where a complete incline from the surface is warranted. In most situations of this sort, and in all of the second type (where the outcrop is outside the property), actual choice usually lies between combined shafts (_C D F_) and entire vertical shafts (_H G_). The difference between a combined shaft and a direct vertical shaft can be reduced to a comparison of the combined shaft below the point of intersection (_D_) with that portion of a vertical shaft which would cover the same horizon. The question then becomes identical with that of inclined _versus_ verticals, as stated in Case III, with the offsetting disadvantage of the bend in the combined shaft. If it is desired to reach production at the earliest date, the lower section of a simple vertical shaft must have crosscuts to reach the ore lying above the horizon of its intersection (_E_). If production does not press, the ore above the intersection (_EB_) can be worked by rises from the horizon of intersection (_E_). In the use of rises, however, there fol
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80  
81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

combined

 

incline

 
vertical
 

intersection

 

simple

 

shafts

 

surface

 

horizon

 

section

 
deposit

inclined

 
portion
 
advisable
 
direct
 
production
 

situations

 

outcrop

 

property

 

actual

 

warranted


instances

 

general

 

special

 

choice

 

complete

 

worked

 

projects

 

difference

 
versus
 

verticals


stated

 

identical

 

earliest

 

disadvantage

 
desired
 
offsetting
 

crosscuts

 
question
 
reduced
 

entire


comparison
 
calculation
 

operating

 

greater

 

haulage

 

winding

 

attacked

 

cheaply

 

constructed

 

stopes