FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44  
45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   >>   >|  
itself. _This latter conception has been adopted of old._ [15:1] Compare No. I Secs. 5, 15, 30, 31. [18:1] The Swedish majority had contemplated a provision in the Act of Union, wherevy it became incumbent for both Kingdoms to place a fixed minimum of fighting forces to the disposition of the Union. [18:2] NANSEN says (page 71) "Divisions arose partly over the resistance from the Swedish side to the unanimous demand of the Norwegian delegates for a separate Consular Service." This is, as plainly apparent, an extremely modified version of the truth. III. [Sidenote: _His Excellency Mr. Lagerheim's Proposal._] His Excellency Mr. LAGERHEIM'S proposal implied an attempt to settle the Consular Question itself, by retaining the existing Foreign Administration and dissolving the joint Consular Service. By doing this, he plainly foresaw that the Consular Question would inevitably be raised afresh on the part of Norway. It was necessary therefore to lead the work of reform in the quiet paths of Union negotiations, in order to prevent the old attempts on Norway's side "to take matters into her own hands", to the detriment of the harmony in the Union. If results in that way could be gained, negotiative operations might win more confidence from distrustful Norwegian politicians. The Swedish government seems also to have taken into account the contingency that, by making this offer, they would get Norway to meet them half way, and agree sooner or later to a definite solution of the Union conflict, by a reorganisation, on the grounds of having a joint Minister for Foreign affairs. In one respect, it was undeniably a good opportunity for such an attempt. The violent Russianizing of Finland, and the undefined plots it concealed, could not fail to open the eyes of many in Norway. Even Norwegian Radicals were obliged to acknowledge that the integrity of the Kingdoms of Scandinavia formed a necessary guarantee for their freedom and independence[19:1]. It was certainly on that account that their courage was not so fully shared by all, when the Norwegian Radicals prepared to renew their old efforts to break the Union. An honourable compromise with Sweden, on that occasion, would probably have been acceptable. But Mr LAGERHEIM'S experiment had, on all hands, almost insurmountable difficulties through which to pilot its way. [Sidenote: _The difficulties attending the satisfactory settlement of the Consular Question
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44  
45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Consular

 
Norway
 

Norwegian

 
Swedish
 

Question

 

Foreign

 
LAGERHEIM
 

attempt

 

Excellency

 

Radicals


Sidenote

 
plainly
 

Service

 

account

 

Kingdoms

 

difficulties

 

contingency

 
undeniably
 

respect

 

politicians


government

 

making

 

opportunity

 

definite

 

sooner

 
violent
 
conflict
 

reorganisation

 
grounds
 

solution


Minister
 

affairs

 

compromise

 

Sweden

 
occasion
 

honourable

 

prepared

 

efforts

 
acceptable
 

attending


satisfactory

 
settlement
 

experiment

 

insurmountable

 

shared

 
distrustful
 

obliged

 
Finland
 

undefined

 

concealed