FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78  
79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   >>   >|  
ght, according to Constitutional law, to form his decision according to his own judgment. It was furthermore the Prime Minister's undoubted duty to countersign his decree, the Cabinet, by raising protestations, were released from constitutional responsibility for the royal decree according to the rules of the fundamental law. But the Cabinet maintained another interpretation of the fundamental law, and sent in their resignations, which the King, meanwhile, refused to grant as he could not _for the present_--"now"-- form a new Ministry. This word 'now' in the King's refusal to the Cabinets appeal to resign, undoubtedly implies a reminder of earlier similar situations in the beginning of 1890, when the Ministry--on one or two occasions _Radical_ --had remained in office some time after they had tendered their appeals to resign, as the King was unable to form a new ministry. It was also without doubt the legislative duty of the Ministry to remain at their post till the King released them. For, according to the general constitutional and administrative ideas of justice, it is the King who releases his Ministers; they have no legal right to retire of themselves. It is not Norway's _King_ who has transgressed the law, in spite of all the accusations to that effect from Norway's government[59:1]. _The law was transgressed on June 6th by the Norwegian Cabinet, when they informed the King that they resigned office_[59:2]. [Sidenote: _The Norwegian Revolution._] Their chief reason for this proceeding they declared to be their inability to be a party to the King's policy, which according to their opinion, was not in accordance with the Norwegian Constitution, and declared themselves to be 'free men' entitled to the right to resign office[60:1]. King OSCAR immediately sent protestations against this proceeding on the part of the Ministers, both to the Storthing and the Premier[60:2]. But before these came to hand, the next act was played out. On the 7th June the Cabinet informed the Storthing of their resignation[60:3]. The Storthing forgetful of the very important little word _now_ categorically recorded the fact that the King had declared himself incapable of forming a new government, and came to the conclusion that the Constitutional Royal Power was "no longer effectual", on which the late Ministers were admonished to take up the reins of government, which, according to Constitutional law, was the King's prerogative al
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78  
79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Cabinet

 
office
 

declared

 

resign

 

government

 

Constitutional

 

Ministers

 

Norwegian

 
Storthing
 

Ministry


informed

 

Norway

 

transgressed

 

proceeding

 

released

 
protestations
 

decree

 

fundamental

 
constitutional
 

prerogative


reason

 

conclusion

 

forming

 

policy

 
inability
 

Revolution

 

admonished

 

effectual

 

opinion

 

Sidenote


resigned

 

longer

 
Constitution
 
played
 

categorically

 

forgetful

 

important

 

resignation

 

effect

 

Premier


entitled

 
incapable
 

recorded

 

immediately

 

accordance

 

present

 

refusal

 

refused

 
Cabinets
 
appeal