FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86  
87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   >>   >|  
om manual labor is known only in theory, have persistently ruled that the _Constitution forbade the State to make laws protecting women workers_. It has seemed to most of our courts and most of our judges that the State fulfilled its whole duty to its women citizens when it guaranteed them the right freely to contract--even though they consented, or their poverty consented, to contracts which involved irreparable harm to themselves, the community, and future generations. The women of this country have done nothing more important than to educate the judiciary of the United States out of and beyond this terrible delusion. CHAPTER VI MAKING OVER THE FACTORY FROM THE INSIDE The decision of the United States Supreme Court, establishing the legality of restricted hours of labor for Oregon working women, was received with especial satisfaction in the State of Illinois. The Illinois working women, or that thriving minority of them organized in labor unions, had been waiting sixteen years for a favorable opportunity to get an eight-hour day for themselves. Sixteen years ago the Illinois State Legislature gave the working women such a law, and two years later the Illinois Supreme Court took it away from them, on the ground that it was unconstitutional. The action of the Illinois Supreme Court was by no means without precedent. Many similar decisions had been handed down in other States, until it had become almost a principle of American law that protective legislation for working women was invalid. The process of reasoning by which learned judges reach the conclusion that an eight-hour day for men may be decreed without depriving anybody of his constitutional rights, and at the same time rule that women would be outrageously wronged by having their working hours limited, may appear obscure. The explanation is, after all, simple. The learned judges are men, and they know something--not much, but still something--about the men of the working classes. They know, for example, something about the conditions under which coal miners work, and they can see that it is contrary to public interests that men should toil underground, at arduous labor, twelve hours a day. Accidents result with painful frequency, and these are bad things,--bad for miners and mine owners alike. They are bad for the whole community. Therefore the regulation of miners' hours of labor comes legitimately under the police powers of the law.
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86  
87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

working

 

Illinois

 
judges
 

Supreme

 

States

 

miners

 

community

 

United

 

learned

 
consented

constitutional

 
precedent
 
similar
 
decisions
 
rights
 

handed

 

American

 

reasoning

 

process

 

conclusion


invalid

 

legislation

 

decreed

 

depriving

 

principle

 

protective

 

twelve

 

Accidents

 
result
 

painful


arduous

 

underground

 

public

 

interests

 
frequency
 
legitimately
 

police

 
powers
 
regulation
 

Therefore


things
 
owners
 

contrary

 

obscure

 

explanation

 

limited

 

outrageously

 

wronged

 

simple

 

conditions