FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39  
40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   >>   >|  
"[Greek: Heudonti kurtos hairei]. Dormienti rete trahit."] _Rings formerly worn by Ecclesiastics._--In describing the finger-ring found in the grave of the Venerable Bede, the writer of _A brief Account of Durham Cathedral_ adds,-- "No priest, during the reign of Catholicity, was buried or enshrined without his ring."--P. 81. I have seen a similar statement elsewhere, and wish to ask, 1st, Were priests formerly buried with the ring? 2ndly, If so, was it a mere custom, or was it ordered or authorised by any rubric or canon of our old English Church? I am very strongly of opinion that such never was the custom, and that the statement above quoted has its origin in the confounding priests with bishops. Martene says, when speaking of the manner of burying bishops,-- "Episcopus debet habere annulum, quia sponsus est. Caeteri sacerdotes non, quia sponsi non sunt, sed amici sponsi vel vicarii."--_De Antiquis Ecclesiae Ritibus_, lib. III. cap. xii. n. 11. CEYREP. _Butler's "Lives of the Saints."_--Can any of your correspondents supply a correct list of the various editions of this popular work? The notices in Watt and Lowndes are very unsatisfactory. J. YEOWELL. _Marriage of Cousins._--It was asserted to me the other day that marriage with a _second_ cousin is, by the laws of England, illegal, and that succession to property has been lately barred to the issue of such marriage, though the union of _first_ cousins entails no such consequences. Is there any foundation for this statement? J. P. _Castle Thorpe_[4], _Bucks._--A traditional rhyme is current at this place which says that-- "If it hadn't been for Cobb-bush Hill, Thorpe Castle would have stood there still." or the last line, according to another version,-- "There would have been a castle at Thorpe still." Now it appears from Lipscomb's _History_ of the county, that the castle was demolished by Fulke de Brent about 1215; how then can this tradition be explained? Cobb-bush Hill, I am told, is more than half a mile from the village. H. THOS. WAKE. [Footnote 4: Pronounced _Thrup_.] _Where was Edward II. killed?_--Hume and Lingard state that this monarch was murdered at Berkeley Castle. Echard and Rapin are silent, both as to the event and as to the locality. But an earlier authority, viz. Martyn, in his _Historie and Lives of Twentie Kings_, 1615, says: "He was committed to the Castle of Killingwor
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39  
40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Castle

 

Thorpe

 

statement

 

custom

 

priests

 

sponsi

 

bishops

 

marriage

 

castle

 
buried

cousins
 

cousin

 

entails

 
property
 

version

 

consequences

 
current
 

England

 
illegal
 

succession


barred
 

foundation

 

traditional

 

Echard

 

Berkeley

 

silent

 

murdered

 

monarch

 

killed

 

Lingard


locality

 

committed

 

Killingwor

 
Twentie
 

Historie

 

earlier

 

authority

 
Martyn
 

Edward

 
tradition

History
 
Lipscomb
 

county

 

demolished

 

explained

 

Footnote

 

Pronounced

 

village

 
appears
 

correct