sort such as he has sometimes
been accused of; and if in 1755 he took occasion to resent with
"honest and indignant warmth" a violation of his rights, there must
have been some special provocation.
Mr. James Bonar suggests that this manifesto of 1755 was directed
against Adam Ferguson, but that is not probable. Ferguson's name, it
is true, will readily occur in such a connection, because Dr. Carlyle
tells us that when he published his _History of Civil Society_ in 1767
Smith accused him of having borrowed some of his ideas without owning
them, and that Ferguson replied that he had borrowed nothing from
Smith, but much from some French source unnamed where Smith had been
before him. But, however this may have been in 1767, it is unlikely
that Ferguson was the occasion of offence in 1755. Up till that year
he was generally living abroad with the regiment of which he was
chaplain, and it is not probable that he had begun his _History_
before his return to Scotland, or that he had time between his return
and the composition of Smith's manifesto to do or project anything to
occasion such a remonstrance. Then he is found on the friendliest
footing with Smith in the years immediately following the manifesto,
and Stewart's allusion to the circumstances implies a graver breach
than could be healed so summarily. Besides, had Ferguson been the
cause of offence, Stewart would have probably avoided the subject
altogether in a paper to the Royal Society, of which Ferguson was
still an active member.
FOOTNOTES:
[27] Thomson's _Life of Cullen_, i. 605.
[28] Thomson's _Life of Cullen_, i. 606.
[29] Bisset's _Burke_, i. 32.
[30] Prior's _Burke_, p. 38.
[31] _Outlines of the Philosophy of Education_, p. 23.
[32] Prior's _Life of Burke_, Bohn's ed. p. 38.
[33] Burton's _Life of Hume_, ii. 55.
[34] _Caldwell Papers_, i. 170.
[35] Hamilton's _Reid_, p. 40.
[36] _Brougham's Life and Times_, i. 78.
[37] Chamberlayne's _Angliae Notitia_ for 1750.
[38] Smith's copy of this book seems to have gone out of existence
like the others, for his cousin and heir, David Douglas, wrote Lord
Buchan in January 1792 that he had searched for it in Smith's library
without any success, and that though a catalogue of the library had
since then been made out, Lockhart's Memoirs was not contained in it.
Douglas's letter is in the Edinburgh University Library.
[39] Book II. chap. x.
[40] Cockburn's _Life of Jeffrey_, p. 12.
|