sent a dominant position in the world, which I was
afraid he would lose if he went into conference with the foreign
statesmen; that he could practically dictate the terms of peace if he
held aloof; that he would be criticized severely in this country for
leaving at a time when Congress particularly needed his guidance; and
that he would be greatly embarrassed in directing domestic affairs
from overseas."
I also recorded as significant that the President listened to my remarks
without comment and turned the conversation into other channels.
For a week after this interview I heard nothing from the President on
the subject, though the fact that no steps were taken to prepare written
instructions for the American Commissioners convinced me that he
intended to follow his original intention. My fears were confirmed. On
the evening of Monday, November 18, the President came to my residence
and told me that he had finally decided to go to the Peace Conference
and that he had given out to the press an announcement to that effect.
In view of the publicity given to his decision it would have been futile
to have attempted to dissuade him from his purpose. He knew my opinion
and that it was contrary to his.
After the President departed I made a note of the interview, in which
among other things I wrote:
"I am convinced that he is making one of the greatest mistakes of his
career and will imperil his reputation. I may be in error and hope
that I am, but I prophesy trouble in Paris and worse than trouble
here. I believe the President's place is here in America."
Whether the decision of Mr. Wilson was wise and whether my prophecy was
unfulfilled, I leave to the judgment of others. His visit to Europe and
its consequences are facts of history. It should be understood that the
incident is not referred to here to justify my views or to prove that
the President was wrong in what he did. The reference is made solely
because it shows that at the very outset there was a decided divergence
of judgment between us in regard to the peace negotiations.
While this difference of opinion apparently in no way affected our
cordial relations, I cannot but feel, in reviewing this period of our
intercourse, that my open opposition to his attending the Conference was
considered by the President to be an unwarranted meddling with his
personal affairs and was none of my business. It was, I believe, the
beginning of h
|