FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202  
203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   >>   >|  
s--_creta marga_ of Linnaeus--known locally as malm, marl, clunch, &c.; and harder, more stony kinds, called rag, freestone, rock, hurlock or harrock in different districts. In certain parts of the formation layers of nodular flints (q.v.) abound; in parts, it is inclined to be sandy, or to contain grains of glauconite which was originally confounded with another green mineral, chlorite, hence the name "chloritic marl" applied to one of the subdivisions of the chalk. In its purest form chalk consists of from 95 to 99% of calcium carbonate (carbonate of lime); in this condition it is composed of a mass of fine granular particles held together by a somewhat feeble calcareous cement. The particles are mostly the broken tests of foraminifera, along with the debris of echinoderm and molluscan shells, and many minute bodies, like coccoliths, of somewhat obscure nature. The earliest attempts at subdivision of the Chalk formation initiated by Wm. Phillips were based upon lithological characters, and such a classification as "Upper Chalk with Flints," "Lower Chalk without Flints," "Chalk marl or Grey chalk," was generally in use in England until W. Whitaker established the following order in 1865:-- Upper Chalk, with flints / chalk rock Lower Chalk < chalk with few flints \ chalk without flints Chalk Marl / Totternhoe stone \ " marl In France, a similar system of classification was in vogue, the subdivisions being _craie blanche_, _craie tufan_, _craie chloritee_, until 1843 when d'Orbigny proposed the term _Senonien_ for the Upper Chalk and _Turonien_ for the Lower; later he divided the _Turonien_, giving the name _Cenomanien_ to the lower portion. The subdivisions of d'Orbigny were based upon the fossil contents and not upon the lithological characters of the rocks. In 1876 Prof. Ch. Barrois showed how d'Orbigny's classification might be applied to the British chalk rocks; and this scheme has been generally adopted by geologists, although there is some divergence of opinion as to the exact position of the base line of the Cenomanian. The accompanying table shows the classification now adopted in England, with the zonal fossils and the continental names of the substages:-- +-----------------------------------------------+---------------------+----------+-----------+ |
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202  
203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

classification

 

flints

 
Orbigny
 

subdivisions

 

characters

 
lithological
 

Turonien

 

applied

 

Flints

 

particles


England

 

generally

 
carbonate
 

formation

 
adopted
 
Totternhoe
 
similar
 

system

 

position

 

France


fossils

 

substages

 
continental
 

accompanying

 

opinion

 

Whitaker

 
Cenomanian
 

established

 

portion

 

fossil


British

 

Cenomanien

 

giving

 

scheme

 

contents

 

Barrois

 

showed

 
chloritee
 

divergence

 

geologists


divided

 

Senonien

 
proposed
 
blanche
 

grains

 

glauconite

 

inclined

 
abound
 

nodular

 

originally