FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121  
122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   >>   >|  
called. For inventing there is always required a natural aptitude, sometimes, a happy chance. The natural disposition should be accepted as a fact. Why does a man create? Because he is capable of forming new combinations of ideas. However naive this answer may be, there is no other. The only thing possible, is the determination of the conditions necessary and sufficient for producing novel combinations: this has been done in the first part of this book, and there is no occasion for going over it again. But there is another aspect in creative work to be considered--its psychological _mechanism_, and the form of its development. Every normal person creates little or much. He may, in his ignorance, invent what has been already done a thousand times. Even if this is not a creation as regards the species, it is none the less such for the individual. It is wrong to say, as has been said, that an invention "is a new and important idea." _Novelty_ only is essential--that is the psychological mark: importance and utility are accessory, merely social marks. Invention is thus unduly limited when we attribute it to great inventors only. At this moment, however, we are concerned only with these, and in them the mechanism of invention is easier to study. We have already seen how false is the theory that holds that there is always a sudden stroke of inspiration, followed by a period of rapid or slow execution. On the contrary, observation reveals many processes that apparently differ less in the _content_ of invention than according to individual temperament. I distinguish two general processes of which the rest are variations. In all creation, great or small, there is a directing idea, an "ideal"--understanding the word not in its transcendental sense, but merely as synonymous with end or goal--or more simply, a problem to solve. The _locus_ of the idea, of the given problem, is not the same in the two processes. In the one I term "complete" the ideal is at the beginning: in the "abridged" it is in the middle. There are also other differences which the following tables will make more clear: _First Process_ (_complete_). 1st phase 2nd phase 3d phase IDEA INVENTION, VERIFICATION, (commencement) or or Special incubation DISCOVERY APPLICATION of more or less (end) duration The idea excites attention and tak
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121  
122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

invention

 

processes

 

problem

 

complete

 

individual

 

creation

 

mechanism

 

psychological

 

combinations

 
natural

DISCOVERY

 
incubation
 
APPLICATION
 

contrary

 
execution
 

reveals

 

differ

 

content

 
INVENTION
 

VERIFICATION


apparently

 

Special

 

commencement

 
observation
 
duration
 

attention

 

excites

 

easier

 

theory

 

period


inspiration

 
sudden
 

stroke

 

simply

 

differences

 

tables

 

synonymous

 

middle

 
abridged
 

general


Process
 
temperament
 

beginning

 

distinguish

 

variations

 

understanding

 

transcendental

 
directing
 

sufficient

 
producing