FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   552   553   554   555   556   557   558   559   560   561   562   563   564   565   566   567   568   569   570   571   572   573   574   575   576  
577   578   579   580   581   582   583   584   585   586   587   588   589   590   591   592   593   594   595   596   597   598   599   600   601   >>   >|  
heir face that he _had_ "officially interposed" for Paine by two Ministers? Madison, writing to Monroe, April 7, 1796, says that Pickering had spoken to him "in harsh terms" of a letter written by Paine to the President. This was a private letter of September 20, 1795, afterwards printed in Paine's public Letter to Washington. The Secretary certainly read that letter on its arrival, January 18, 1796, and yet Washington does not appear to have told him of what had been officially done in Paine's case! Such being the secrecy which Washington had carried from the camp to the cabinet, and the morbid extent of it while the British Treaty was in negotiation and discussion, one can hardly wonder at his silence under Paine's private appeal and public reproach. Much as Pickering hated Paine, he declares him the only man who ever told the simple truth about Washington. In the lapse of time historical research, while removing the sacred halo of Washington, has revealed beneath it a stronger brain than was then known to any one. Paine published what many whispered, while they were fawning on Washington for office, or utilizing his power for partisan ends. Washington, during his second administration, when his mental decline was remarked by himself, by Jefferson, and others, was regarded by many of his eminent contemporaries as fallen under the sway of small partisans. Not only was the influence of Jefferson, Madison, Randolph, Monroe, Livingston, alienated, but the counsels of Hamilton were neutralized by Wolcott and Pickering, who apparently agreed about the President's "mental powers." Had not Paine previously incurred the _odium theologicum_, his pamphlet concerning Washington would have been more damaging; even as it was, the verdict was by no means generally favorable to the President, especially as the replies to Paine assumed that Washington had indeed failed to try and rescue him from impending death.(1) A pamphlet written by Bache, printed anonymously (1797), Remarks occasioned by the late conduct of Mr. Washington, indicates the belief of those who raised Washington to power, that both Randolph and Paine had been sacrificed to please Great Britain. The _Bien-informe_ (Paris, November 12, 1797) published a letter from Philadelphia, which may find translation here as part of the history of the pamphlet: "The letter of Thomas Paine to General Washington is read here with avidity. We gather from the English papers tha
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   552   553   554   555   556   557   558   559   560   561   562   563   564   565   566   567   568   569   570   571   572   573   574   575   576  
577   578   579   580   581   582   583   584   585   586   587   588   589   590   591   592   593   594   595   596   597   598   599   600   601   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Washington

 

letter

 
President
 

Pickering

 

pamphlet

 
Randolph
 

mental

 

Jefferson

 
published
 

officially


private

 

Monroe

 

Madison

 

printed

 
written
 

public

 

theologicum

 

incurred

 

powers

 

previously


avidity

 

verdict

 

damaging

 

regarded

 

agreed

 

apparently

 

fallen

 

contemporaries

 

Livingston

 
alienated

influence

 

papers

 

partisans

 
Hamilton
 
neutralized
 
Wolcott
 

gather

 

generally

 
counsels
 

eminent


English

 
raised
 
translation
 
belief
 

conduct

 

informe

 
Britain
 

Philadelphia

 

sacrificed

 

occasioned