FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   367   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376   377   378   379   380   381   382   383   384   385   386   387   388   389   390   391  
392   393   394   395   396   397   398   399   400   401   402   403   404   405   406   407   408   409   410   411   412   413   414   415   416   >>   >|  
rs 4 | ... 14 | ... ... | 6 Cigarmakers 5 | ... 1 | ... 10 | ... Bookbinders 3 | ... ... | ... 10 | ... Printers 5 | ... ... | ... 65 | ... Other mechanics [A] 45 | ... 2 | ... 182 | ... Apprentices 43 | 8 14 | 7 55 | 5 Unclassified, unskilled laborers 838 | 378 19 | 2 192 | ... Superannuated 38 | 54 1 | 5 ... | ... [Footnote A: The slaves and free negroes in this group were designated merely as mechanics. The whites were classified as follows: 3 joiners, 1 plumber, 8 gas fitters, 7 bell hangers, 1 paper hanger, 6 carvers and gilders, 9 sail makers, 5 riggers, 1 bottler, 8 sugar makers, 43 engineers, 10 machinists, 6 boilermakers, 7 stone cutters, 4 piano and organ builders, 23 silversmiths, 15 watchmakers, 3 hair braiders, 1 engraver, 1 cutler, 3 molders, 3 pump and block makers, 2 turners, 2 wigmakers, 1 basketmaker, 1 bleacher, 4 dyers, and 4 journeymen. In addition there were enumerated of whites in non-mechanical employments in which the negroes did not participate, 7 omnibus drivers and 16 barkeepers.] On the other hand, although Charleston excelled every other city in the proportion of slaves in its population, free laborers predominated in all the other industrial groups, though but slightly in the cases of the masons and carpenters. The whites, furthermore, heavily outnumbered the free negroes in virtually all the trades but that of barbering which they shunned. Among women workers the free colored ranked first as seamstresses, washerwomen, nurses and cooks, with white women competing strongly in the sewing trades alone. A census of Savannah in the same year shows a similar predominance of whites in all the male trades but that of the barbers, in which there were counted five free negroes, one slave and no whites.[2] From such statistics two conclusions are clear: first, that the repulsion of the whites was not against manual work but against menial service; second, that the presence of the slaves in the town trades was mainly due to the presence of their fellows as domestics. [Footnote 2: Joseph Bancroft, _Census of the City of Savannah_ (Savannah, 1848).] Most of the slave mechanics and out-of-door laborers were the husbands and sons of the cooks and chambermaids, dwelling with them on their masters' premises, where the back yard with its cr
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   367   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376   377   378   379   380   381   382   383   384   385   386   387   388   389   390   391  
392   393   394   395   396   397   398   399   400   401   402   403   404   405   406   407   408   409   410   411   412   413   414   415   416   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
whites
 

trades

 

negroes

 

mechanics

 

slaves

 

makers

 

Savannah

 
laborers
 

presence

 
Footnote

similar

 

census

 

competing

 

strongly

 

sewing

 
slightly
 

shunned

 
barbering
 

virtually

 

heavily


carpenters

 
outnumbered
 

predominance

 

masons

 

ranked

 

seamstresses

 

washerwomen

 
colored
 

workers

 

nurses


repulsion
 

husbands

 
domestics
 

Joseph

 

Bancroft

 

Census

 

chambermaids

 

premises

 

masters

 

dwelling


fellows

 

statistics

 

conclusions

 
barbers
 
counted
 

service

 
menial
 

manual

 

drivers

 

fitters