ell
as to the details of the story.
[6] _Cal. St. P., Dom._, 1634-1635, 152.
[7] John Stearne, _A Confirmation and Discovery of Witchcraft ...
together with the Confessions of many of those executed since May 1645_
(London, 1648), 11, says that in Lancashire "nineteene assembled."
Robinson's deposition as printed by Webster, _Displaying of Supposed
Witchcraft_, gives nineteen names.
[8] Webster, _op. cit._, 277.
[9] The boy, in his first examinations at London, said he had made up
the story himself.
[10] It is a curious thing that one of the justices of the peace was
John Starchie, who had been one of the bewitched boys of the Starchie
family at Cleworth in 1597. See above, ch. IV. See Baines, _Lancaster_,
ed. of 1868-1870, I, 204.
[11] This incident is related by Webster, _op. cit._, 276-278. Webster
tells us that the boy was yet living when he wrote, and that he himself
had heard the whole story from his mouth more than once. He appends to
his volume the original deposition of the lad (at Padiham, February 10
1633/4).
[12] These are given in the same deposition, but the deposition probably
represents the boy's statement at the assizes.
[13] The father had been a witness at the Lancashire trials in 1612. See
Baines, _Lancaster_, ed. of 1868-1870, I, 204-205.
[14] That is, of course, so far as we have evidence. It is a little
dangerous to hold to absolute negatives.
[15] Webster, _op. cit._, 277. Pelham on May 16, 1634, wrote: "It is
said that 19 are condemned and ... 60 already discovered." _Cal. St. P.,
Dom._, 1634-1635, 26.
[16] It had been reported in London that witches had raised a storm from
which Charles had suffered at sea. Pelham's letter, _ibid._
[17] _Ibid._, 77. See also Council Register (MS.), Charles I, vol. IV,
p. 658.
[18] _Hist. MSS. Comm. Reports_, XII, 2, p. 53. The chancellor of the
Duchy of Lancaster wrote in the meantime that the judges had been to see
him. What was to be done with the witches?
[19] See _Hist. MSS. Comm. Reports_, X, 2, p. 147; and _Cal. St. P.,
Dom., 1634-1635_, 98.
[20] _Cal. St. P., Dom._, 1634-1635, 98, 129. See also Council Register
(MS.), Chas. I, vol. V, p. 56.
[21] _Cal. St. P., Dom._, 1634-1635, 129.
[22] Webster, _op. cit._, 277, says that they were examined "after by
His Majesty and the Council."
[23] See Council Register (MS.), Charles I, vol. IV, p. 657.
[24] _Cal. St. P., Dom., 1634-1635_, 141.
[25] _Ibid._, 152.
[26
|