s pamphlet,
especially since he noticed that the confessions were "imitations" of
those in Essex.
[77] A. Gibbons, ed., _Ely Episcopal Records_ (Lincoln, 1891), 112-113.
[78] Stearne, 37.
[79] That there were assizes is proved by the statement that "Moore's
wife" confessed before the "Judge, Bench, and Country," _ibid._, 21-22,
as well as by the reference in the _Ely Episcopal Records_, 113, to the
"assizes."
[80] Stearne, 17, 21-22.
[81] For a clear statement of this point of view, see _ibid._, 40-50.
[82] Stearne, 46-47.
[83] _Ibid._, 50.
[84] _Ibid._, 17.
[85] _Ibid._, 13.
[86] _Ibid._, 14.
[87] Hopkins, 5. But Hopkins was not telling the exact truth here. When
he was at Aldeburgh in September (8th) the accused were watched day and
night. See chamberlain's accounts, in N. F. Hele, _Notes or Jottings
about Aldeburgh_, 43.
[88] Hopkins, 7.
[89] Hopkins, 9.
[90] Stearne, 18. Hopkins did not attempt to deny the use of the ordeal.
He supported himself by quoting James; see Hopkins, 6.
[91] Stearne, 18. He means, of course, Serjeant Godbolt.
[92] See Stearne, in his preface to the reader, also p. 61; and see also
the complete title of Hopkins's book as given in appendix A (p. 362).
[93] A similar case was that of Anne Binkes, to whom Stearne refers on
p. 54. He says she confessed to him her guilt. "Was this woman fitting
to live?... I am sure she was living not long since, and acquitted upon
her trial."
[94] Not until after Stearne was already busy elsewhere. Stearne, 58.
[95] It would seem, too, that Stearne was sued for recovery of sums paid
him. "Many rather fall upon me for what hath been received; but I hope
such suits will be disannulled." Stearne, 60.
[96] Hopkins, 11.
[97] _County Folk Lore, Suffolk_ (Folk Lore Soc.) 176, quoting from J.
T. Varden in the _East Anglian Handbook_ for 1885, p. 89.
[98] James Howell, _Familiar Letters_, II, 551. Howell, of course, may
easily have counted convictions as executions. Moreover, it was a time
when rumors were flying about, and Howell would not have taken the pains
to sift them. Yet his agreement with Stearne in numbers is remarkable.
Somewhat earlier, (the letter is dated February 3, 1646/7) Howell had
written that "in Essex and Suffolk there were above two hundred indicted
within these two years and above the one half executed" (_ibid._, 506).
But, as noted above, his dates are not to be trusted.
[99] See his _History
|