FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   >>  
eys insisted that they stop breaking open and plundering the houses and barns of the former rebels, and take their complaints to the courts. For three months Berkeley postponed his departure, but at last, on April 25, he went on board the _Rebecca_, the vessel which had been of such vital importance to him during the rebellion, and set sail for England. But he was now a very ill man. "He came here alive but ... unlike to live," wrote Secretary Coventry. He died on July 13, 1677, and was interred at Twickenham. With the death of Berkeley a main cause of discontent and insubordination in Virginia was removed. Though Culpeper and Effingham, who succeeded in turn to the governorship, made onslaughts on the liberties of the people, they acted, not from any overwhelming desire to make themselves absolute, but because they reflected the spirit of the Second Stuart Despotism. But this came to an end with the Glorious Revolution of 1688-89, and from that time to the passage of the Stamp Act, the people of Virginia had no need to take arms to defend their liberties. For decades after Bacon's Rebellion, the King and the governors were wary of bearing down upon them too hard for fear of causing another uprising. For the time they had learned their lesson. And had they not forgotten it after the lapse of a century, there might have been no American Revolution. When one reviews the tragic events in Virginia during the fateful year of 1676, one may well ask: "Would the rebellion have occurred had there been no Indian war?" Possibly not. Berkeley was aging and within a few years he might have died, and a less despotic governor taken his place. Had the planters waited, their lot would have been bettered by the rising price of tobacco. On the other hand, it is possible that if the war had not touched off the rebellion something else would have done so. Would the Indian war have started the rebellion had the mass of the people had no other grievances? This seems unlikely. When the news of the uprising reached Charles II he thought it past belief that "so considerable a body of men, without the least grievance or oppression, should rise up in arms and overturn the government." And so it would have been past belief had there been no grievance or oppression. Had the dispute between Bacon and Berkeley as to how the war should be conducted been all there was at issue, the people would hardly have risen in wild anger to overthrow the
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   >>  



Top keywords:
people
 

rebellion

 

Berkeley

 

Virginia

 

uprising

 

Indian

 
Revolution
 

liberties

 

belief

 
oppression

grievance

 

fateful

 

dispute

 

events

 
tragic
 

Possibly

 

overturn

 
occurred
 

government

 

forgotten


lesson

 

learned

 
causing
 

overthrow

 

century

 

American

 
reviews
 

conducted

 
governor
 
started

touched

 

grievances

 

reached

 

thought

 

Charles

 

considerable

 

planters

 

waited

 

bettered

 
tobacco

rising
 

despotic

 

England

 

importance

 
unlike
 

interred

 

Twickenham

 
Secretary
 

Coventry

 

houses