FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106  
107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   >>   >|  
n C is D, A is B_ (none) _If C is D, A is not B_ Sometimes _when C is d, A is B_ (none) Sometimes _when C is d, A is B_ As to Disjunctives, the attempt to put them through these different forms immediately destroys their disjunctive character. Still, given any proposition in the form _A is either B or C_, we can state the propositions that give the sense of obversion, conversion, etc., thus: DATUM.--_A is either B or C;_ OBVERSE.--_A is not both b and c;_ CONVERSE.--_Something, either B or C, is A;_ CONTRAPOSITIVE.--_Nothing that is both b and c is A_. For a Disjunctive in I., of course, there is no Contrapositive. Given a Disjunctive in the form _Either A is B or C is D_, we may write for its Obverse--_In no case is A b, and C at the same time d_. But no Converse or Contrapositive of such a Disjunctive can be obtained, except by first casting it into the hypothetical or categorical form. The reader who wishes to pursue this subject further, will find it elaborately treated in Dr. Keynes' _Formal Logic_, Part II.; to which work the above chapter is indebted. CHAPTER VIII ORDER OF TERMS, EULER'S DIAGRAMS, LOGICAL EQUATIONS, EXISTENTIAL IMPORT OF PROPOSITIONS Sec. 1. Of the terms of a proposition which is the Subject and which the Predicate? In most of the exemplary propositions cited by Logicians it will be found that the subject is a substantive and the predicate an adjective, as in _Men are mortal_. This is the relation of Substance and Attribute which we saw (chap. i. Sec. 5) to be the central type of relations of coinherence; and on this model other predications may be formed in which the subject is not a substance, but is treated as if it were, and could therefore be the ground of attributes; as _Fame is treacherous, The weather is changeable_. But, in literature, sentences in which the adjective comes first are not uncommon, as _Loud was the applause, Dark is the fate of man, Blessed are the peacemakers_, and so on. Here, then, 'loud,' 'dark' and 'blessed' occupy the place of the logical subject. Are they really the subject, or must we alter the order of such sentences into _The applause was loud_, etc.? If we do, and then proceed to convert, we get _Loud was the applause_, or (more scrupulously) _Some loud noise was the applause_. The last form, it is true, gives the subject a substantive word, but 'applause' has becom
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106  
107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

subject

 

applause

 

Disjunctive

 
sentences
 
Contrapositive
 

treated

 

Sometimes

 
substantive
 

propositions

 

proposition


adjective

 

predicate

 

predications

 
formed
 

exemplary

 

Logicians

 

substance

 
Attribute
 

relation

 
central

mortal

 
Substance
 

relations

 

coinherence

 
blessed
 

occupy

 

scrupulously

 

logical

 

proceed

 

convert


peacemakers

 

weather

 

changeable

 

literature

 
treacherous
 

ground

 
attributes
 
uncommon
 
Blessed
 

Predicate


CONVERSE

 

Something

 

CONTRAPOSITIVE

 
Nothing
 

OBVERSE

 

obversion

 

conversion

 
Obverse
 

Either

 
attempt