FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117  
118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   >>   >|  
nly occurs in Barbara; see chap. x. Sec. 6), its subject and predicate are respectively the less and the greater in extent or denotation; and the premises are called after the peculiar terms they contain: the expressions 'major premise' and 'minor premise' have nothing to do with the order in which the premises are presented; though it is usual to place the major premise first. (3) No term must be distributed in the conclusion unless it is distributed in the premises. It is usual to give this as one of the General Canons of the Syllogism; but we have seen (chap. vi. Sec. 6) that it is of wider application. Indeed, 'not to go beyond the evidence' belongs to the definition of formal proof. A breech of this rule in a syllogism is the fallacy of Illicit Process of the Minor, or of the Major, according to which term has been unwarrantably distributed. The following parasyllogism illicitly distributes both terms of the conclusion: All poets are pathetic; Some orators are not poets: .'. No orators are pathetic. (4) The Middle Term must be distributed at least once in the premises (in order to prove a conclusion in the given terms). For the use of mediate evidence is to show the relation of terms that cannot be directly compared; this is only possible if the middle term furnishes the ground of comparison; and this (in Logic) requires that the whole denotation of the middle should be either included or excluded by one of the other terms; since if we only know that the other terms are related to _some_ of the middle, their respective relations may not be with the same part of it. It is true that in what has been called the "numerically definite syllogism," an inference may be drawn, though our canon seems to be violated. Thus: 60 sheep in 100 are horned; 60 sheep in 100 are blackfaced: .'. at least 20 blackfaced sheep in 100 are horned. But such an argument, though it may be correct Arithmetic, is not Logic at all; and when such numerical evidence is obtainable the comparatively indefinite arguments of Logic are needless. Another apparent exception is the following: Most men are 5 feet high; Most men are semi-rational: .'. Some semi-rational things are 5 feet high. Here the Middle Term (men) is distributed in neither premise, yet the indisputable conclusion is a logical proposition. The premises, however, are really arithmetical; for 'most' means 'more
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117  
118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

premises

 

distributed

 

conclusion

 
premise
 
evidence
 

middle

 

pathetic

 
horned
 

syllogism

 

blackfaced


Middle

 

orators

 

called

 
rational
 

denotation

 

numerically

 

definite

 
requires
 

respective

 
excluded

related

 
included
 

relations

 

numerical

 
indisputable
 

things

 

Another

 

apparent

 

exception

 

logical


proposition

 

arithmetical

 

needless

 

arguments

 
violated
 

argument

 
obtainable
 
comparatively
 
indefinite
 

correct


Arithmetic

 

inference

 

presented

 
General
 

application

 

Canons

 

Syllogism

 
expressions
 

subject

 
Barbara