FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25  
26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   >>  
Project Gutenberg's On Some Fossil Remains of Man, by Thomas H. Huxley This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org Title: On Some Fossil Remains of Man Author: Thomas H. Huxley Posting Date: January 6, 2009 [EBook #2933] Release Date: November, 2001 Language: English Character set encoding: ASCII *** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK ON SOME FOSSIL REMAINS OF MAN *** Produced by Amy E. Zelmer ON SOME FOSSIL REMAINS OF MAN By Thomas H. Huxley I HAVE endeavoured to show, in the preceding Essay, that the ANTHROPINI, or Man Family, form a very well defined group of the Primates, between which and the immediately following Family, the CATARHINI, there is, in the existing world, the same entire absence of any transitional form or connecting link, as between the CATARHINI and PLATYRHINI. It is a commonly received doctrine, however, that the structural intervals between the various existing modifications of organic beings may be diminished, or even obliterated, if we take into account the long and varied succession of animals and plants which have preceded those now living and which are known to us only by their fossilized remains. How far this doctrine is well based, how far, on the other hand, as our knowledge at present stands, it is an overstatement of the real facts of the case, and an exaggeration of the conclusions fairly deducible from them, are points of grave importance, but into the discussion of which I do not, at present, propose to enter. It is enough that such a view of the relations of extinct to living beings has been propounded, to lead us to inquire, with anxiety, how far the recent discoveries of human remains in a fossil state bear out, or oppose, that view. I shall confine myself, in discussing this question, to those fragmentary Human skulls from the caves of Engis in the valley of the Meuse, in Belgium, and of the Neanderthal near Dusseldorf, the geological relations of which have been examined with so much care by Sir Charles Lyell; upon whose high authority I shall take it for granted, that the Engis skull belonged to a contemporary of the Mammoth ('Elephas primigenius') and of the woolly Rhinoceros ('Rhinoceros tichorhinus'), with the bones of wh
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25  
26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   >>  



Top keywords:
Huxley
 

Thomas

 

relations

 

REMAINS

 

Family

 
remains
 
present
 

living

 

existing

 

beings


doctrine

 
CATARHINI
 

FOSSIL

 

Fossil

 

Remains

 

Rhinoceros

 

Project

 

Gutenberg

 

Elephas

 

deducible


fairly
 

woolly

 

primigenius

 
importance
 
Mammoth
 
propose
 
discussion
 

conclusions

 

points

 

tichorhinus


fossilized

 
overstatement
 

contemporary

 

knowledge

 

stands

 
exaggeration
 

oppose

 

Dusseldorf

 

geological

 
fossil

examined

 

confine

 

Neanderthal

 
valley
 

skulls

 

discussing

 

question

 

fragmentary

 

discoveries

 
extinct