FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195  
196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   >>   >|  
this equality of achievement comes from an equality of natural gifts, not from an overstraining of the lesser talents of women.[1] [Footnote 1: Thorndike: _Educational Psychology_, briefer course, pp. 345-46.] That is, so far as experiments upon objectively measurable traits have been conducted, the specific differences that individuals display have comparatively nothing to do with the fact that an individual happens to be a man or a woman. These experiments have been conducted with boys and girls as young as seven, and with men and women ranging up to the age of twenty-five.[2] [Footnote 2: There seems, as might be expected to be, a slightly higher differentiation between the two sexes after adolescence than before.] These experiments have been conducted to test sensory discrimination, precision of motor response and some of the simpler types of judgment, such as those involved in the solution of simple puzzles with blocks, matches, etc. The fact of the negligibility of sex difference with regard to certain minor measurable traits has been adequately demonstrated by a wide variety of experiments. The fact of sex equality or mental capacity has been less accurately but fairly universally noted by popular consensus of observation and opinion of the work of women in the various trades and professions. There are differences between men and women in physical strength and in consequent susceptibility to fatigue. These are important considerations in qualifying the amount of work a woman can do as compared with that of a man, and have justly resulted in the regulation of hours for women, as a special class. But there do not seem to be, on the average, significant original differences in mental capacity.[3] [Footnote 3: On this subject there has been collected a large amount of accurate experimental data. See Goldmark: _Fatigue and Efficiency_, part II, pp. 1-22. These refer to physiological differences.] There do exist, as a matter of practical fact, some of the special attributes commonly ascribed to the masculine and feminine mental life, but it is generally agreed by investigators that these are to be accounted for by the different environment and standards socially established for men and for women. There are radical and subtle differences in training to which boys and girls are subjected from early childhood. There are deeply fixed traditions as to the standards of action, feeling, and demeanor to which
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195  
196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

differences

 

experiments

 

mental

 

conducted

 
Footnote
 
equality
 

amount

 

special

 

measurable

 

traits


capacity

 

standards

 

trades

 

professions

 

subject

 

significant

 

original

 
average
 

resulted

 

feeling


qualifying
 
consequent
 

considerations

 

important

 

fatigue

 

susceptibility

 

collected

 
strength
 

demeanor

 

regulation


justly

 
compared
 

physical

 
Efficiency
 

childhood

 

generally

 
feminine
 
traditions
 

deeply

 

agreed


investigators

 

radical

 

established

 

environment

 

accounted

 

subtle

 
subjected
 

training

 
masculine
 

ascribed