FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101  
102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   >>   >|  
proceed to punish you." "By refusing me?" "No; by giving it to you. I said, did I not, that rebellion does not necessarily bring war?" "That is the postulate," I replied. "Then, first, what is rebellion?" "Rebellion," said I, "rebellion--rebellion," seeking a definition, "rebellion is armed hostility, within a nation or state, to the legalized government of the nation or state." "I am willing to accept that," said the Doctor; "now let us see if there have not been cases of rebellion without war. What do you say of Jeroboam and the ten tribes?" "I say that there was about to be war, and the Almighty put a stop to it." "That is all I pray for," said the Doctor; "then, what do you say of Monk?" "What Monk?" "The general of the commonwealth, who restored Charles the Second." "Monk simply decided a dilemma," said I. "I don't count that a rebellion; the people were glad to settle matters." "Well, we won't count Monk; what do you say--" "No more, Doctor," I interrupted; "I admit that rebellion does not bring war when, the other party won't fight." "But it is wrong to fight," he said. "Then every rebellion ought to succeed," said I. "Certainly it ought, at least for a time. What I am contending is that every revolution should be peaceable. Would not England have been wiser if she had not endeavoured to subdue the colonies? Suppose the principle of peace were cherished: the ideas that would otherwise cause rebellion would be patiently tested; the men of new or opposite ideas would no longer be rebels; they would be statesmen; a rebellion would be accepted, tried, and defeated by a counter rebellion, both peaceable. It is simply leaving things to the will of the majority. Right ideas will win, no matter what the opposition to them. Better change the arena of conflict. A single champion of an idea would once challenge a doubter and prove his hypothesis by the blood of the disputant; you do the same thing on a great scale. The Southern people--very good people as you and I have cause to know--think the constitution gives them the right, or rather cannot take away the right, to withdraw from the Union; you Northern people think they deserve death for so thinking, and you proceed to kill them off; you intend keeping it up until too few of them are left to think fatally; but they _will_ think, and your killing them will not prove your ideas right." "And so you would settle it by letting them a
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101  
102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

rebellion

 

people

 

Doctor

 

peaceable

 

settle

 

simply

 

nation

 

proceed

 

champion

 

single


conflict
 

challenge

 

longer

 
disputant
 
hypothesis
 
doubter
 

rebels

 
change
 

Better

 

leaving


counter

 

defeated

 

accepted

 

statesmen

 

things

 

giving

 

opposition

 

matter

 

majority

 

intend


keeping
 
punish
 
thinking
 

killing

 

letting

 

fatally

 

deserve

 

Northern

 
refusing
 
Southern

constitution

 

withdraw

 
tested
 

Second

 
decided
 

Charles

 
restored
 

general

 

commonwealth

 
dilemma