FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351   352  
353   354   355   356   357   358   359   360   361   362   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376   377   >>   >|  
high road.' Bain's _Life of James Mill_, p. 1. Boswell and Johnson, on their road to Laurence Kirk, must have passed close to the cottage in which he was lying, a baby not five months old. [230] See _ante_, i. 211. [231] There is some account of him in Chambers's _Traditions of Edinburgh_, ed. 1825, ii. 173, and in Dr. A. Carlyle's _Auto._ p. 136. [232] G. Chalmers (_Life of Ruddiman_, p. 270) says:--'In May, 1790, Lord Gardenston declared that he still intended to erect a proper monument in his village to the memory of the late learned and worthy Mr. Ruddiman.' In 1792 Gardenston, in his _Miscellanies_, p. 257, attacked Ruddiman. 'It has of late become fashionable,' he wrote, 'to speak of Ruddiman in terms of the highest respect.' The monument was never raised. [233] _A Letter to the Inhabitants of Laurence Kirk_, by F. Garden. [234] 'Be not forgetful to entertain strangers: for thereby some have entertained angels unawares.' _Hebrews_ xiii, 2. [235] This, I find, is considered as obscure. I suppose Dr. Johnson meant, that I assiduously and earnestly recommended myself to some of the members, as in a canvass for an election into parliament. BOSWELL. See _ante_, ii, 235. [236] Goldsmith in _Retaliation_, a few months later, wrote of William Burke:--'Would you ask for his merits? alas! he had none; What was good was spontaneous, his faults were his own.' See _ante_, iii 362, note 2. [237] See _ante_, iii. 260, 390, 425. [238] Hannah More (_Memoirs_, i. 252) wrote of Monboddo in 1782:--'He is such an extravagant adorer of the ancients, that he scarcely allows the English language to be capable of any excellence, still less the French. He said we moderns are entirely degenerated. I asked in what? "In everything," was his answer. He loves slavery upon principle. I asked him how he could vindicate such an enormity. He owned it was because Plutarch justified it. He is so wedded to system that, as Lord Barrington said to me the other day, rather than sacrifice his favourite opinion that men were born with tails, he would be contented to wear one himself.' [239] Scott, in a note on _Guy Mannering_, ed. 1860, iv. 267, writes of Monboddo:--'The conversation of the excellent old man, his high, gentleman-like, chivalrous spirit, the learning and wit with which he defended his fanciful paradoxes, the kind and liberal spirit of his hospitality, must render these _noctes coenaeque_ dear to all who, like the autho
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351   352  
353   354   355   356   357   358   359   360   361   362   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376   377   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Ruddiman

 

Monboddo

 
Gardenston
 

monument

 
months
 

Johnson

 
Laurence
 

spirit

 
moderns
 

French


render

 
answer
 

slavery

 
degenerated
 
excellence
 

extravagant

 

coenaeque

 

Memoirs

 

Hannah

 

adorer


ancients
 

language

 
noctes
 
capable
 

English

 
scarcely
 

fanciful

 

paradoxes

 

contented

 
defended

Mannering
 

learning

 
excellent
 

gentleman

 

conversation

 
writes
 

liberal

 

hospitality

 

Plutarch

 

justified


wedded

 

chivalrous

 

vindicate

 

enormity

 

system

 
Barrington
 

favourite

 

opinion

 

sacrifice

 
principle