FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   394   395   396   397   398   399   400   401   402   403   404   405   406   407   408   409   410   411   412   413   414   415   416   417   418  
419   420   421   422   423   424   425   426   427   428   429   430   431   432   433   434   435   436   437   438   439   440   441   442   443   >>   >|  
y, to compare the list of European plants in Tierra del Fuego (in Hooker) with those in North America; for, without multiple creation, I think we must admit that all now in T. del Fuego must have travelled through North America, and so far they do concern you. The discussion on social plants (vague as the terms and facts are) in De Candolle strikes me as the best which I have ever seen: two points strike me as eminently remarkable in them; that they should ever be social close to their extreme limits; and secondly, that species having an extremely confined range, yet should be social where they do occur: I should be infinitely obliged for any cases either by letter or publicly on these heads, more especially in regard to a species remaining or ceasing to be social on the confines of its range. There is one other point on which I individually should be extremely much obliged, if you could spare the time to think a little bit and inform me: viz., whether there are any cases of the same species being more variable in United States than in other countries in which it is found, or in different parts of the United States? Wahlenberg says generally that the same species in going south become more variable than in extreme north. Even still more am I anxious to know whether any of the genera, which have most of their species horribly variable (as Rubus or Hieracium are) in Europe, or other parts of the world, are less variable in the United States; or, the reverse case, whether you have any odious genera with you which are less odious in other countries? Any information on this head would be a real kindness to me. I suppose your flora is too great; but a simple list in close columns in small type of all the species, genera, and families, each consecutively numbered, has always struck me as most useful; and Hooker regrets that he did not give such list in introduction to New Zealand and other Flora. I am sure I have given you a larger dose of questions than you bargained for, and I have kept my word and treated you just as I do Hooker. Nevertheless, if anything occurs to me during the next two months, I will write freely, believing that you will forgive me and not think me very presumptuous. How well De Candolle shows the necessity of comparing nearly equal areas for proportion of families! I have re-read this letter, and it is really not worth sending, except for my own sake. I see I forgot, in beginning, to state that
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   394   395   396   397   398   399   400   401   402   403   404   405   406   407   408   409   410   411   412   413   414   415   416   417   418  
419   420   421   422   423   424   425   426   427   428   429   430   431   432   433   434   435   436   437   438   439   440   441   442   443   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
species
 

social

 
variable
 

United

 
States
 

genera

 

Hooker

 
countries
 

America

 

extreme


families
 

extremely

 

letter

 

obliged

 

plants

 
Candolle
 

odious

 
regrets
 
struck
 

introduction


information

 

columns

 

simple

 

numbered

 

consecutively

 

suppose

 

kindness

 

proportion

 

comparing

 

necessity


forgot
 

beginning

 

sending

 
presumptuous
 

bargained

 

treated

 

questions

 

larger

 
Nevertheless
 
freely

believing

 

forgive

 
months
 

occurs

 

Zealand

 

confined

 

limits

 

multiple

 

publicly

 

infinitely