FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   424   425   426   427   428   429   430   431   432   433   434   435   436   437   438   439   440   441   442   443   444   445   446   447   448  
449   450   451   452   453   454   455   456   457   458   459   460   461   462   463   464   >>  
make much difference in the flora whether they have sunk or risen a few thousand feet of late ages. I wish you could work in your notion of certain parts of the Tropics having kept hot, whilst other parts were cooled; I tried this scheme in my mind, and it seemed to fail. On the whole, I like very much all that I have read of your Introduction, and I cannot doubt that it will have great weight in converting other botanists from the doctrine of immutable creation. What a lot of matter there is in one of your pages! There are many points I wish much to discuss with you. How I wish you could work out the Pacific floras: I remember ages ago reading some of your MS. In Paris there must be, I should think, materials from French voyages. But of all places in the world I should like to see a good flora of the Sandwich Islands. (348/4. See Hillebrand, "Flora of the Hawaiian Islands," 1888.) I would subscribe 50 pounds to any collector to go there and work at the islands. Would it not pay for a collector to go there, especially if aided by any subscription? It would be a fair occasion to ask for aid from the Government grant of the Royal Society. I think it is the most isolated group in the world, and the islands themselves well isolated from each other. LETTER 349. TO ASA GRAY. Down, January 7th [1860]. I have just finished your Japan memoir (349/1. "Diagnostic Characters of New Species of Phaenogamous Plants collected in Japan by Charles Wright. With observations upon the Relations of the Japanese Flora to that of North America, etc.: 1857-59."--"Memoirs of Amer. Acad." VI.), and I must thank you for the extreme interest with which I have read it. It seems to me a most curious case of distribution; and how very well you argue, and put the case from analogy on the high probability of single centres of creation. That great man Agassiz, when he comes to reason, seems to me as great in taking a wrong view as he is great in observing and classifying. One of the points which has struck me as most remarkable and inexplicable in your memoir is the number of monotypic (or nearly so) genera amongst the representative forms of Japan and N. America. And how very singular the preponderance of identical and representative species in Eastern, compared with Western, America. I have no good map showing how wide the moderately low country is on the west side of the Rocky Mountains; nor, of course, do I know whether the whole of the
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   424   425   426   427   428   429   430   431   432   433   434   435   436   437   438   439   440   441   442   443   444   445   446   447   448  
449   450   451   452   453   454   455   456   457   458   459   460   461   462   463   464   >>  



Top keywords:
America
 

collector

 
points
 

islands

 
creation
 

Islands

 

representative

 
isolated
 

memoir

 

Plants


Species
 

difference

 

curious

 

Phaenogamous

 

Characters

 
finished
 

distribution

 
Diagnostic
 
collected
 

observations


Relations

 

Japanese

 

Memoirs

 

Charles

 

extreme

 

Wright

 

interest

 

compared

 

Eastern

 

Western


species
 

identical

 

singular

 
preponderance
 

showing

 

Mountains

 

moderately

 

country

 
genera
 
reason

taking

 

Agassiz

 
probability
 

single

 

centres

 

number

 

inexplicable

 

monotypic

 

remarkable

 

struck