FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   426   427   428   429   430   431   432   433   434   435   436   437   438   439   440   441   442   443   444   445   446   447   448   449   450  
451   452   453   454   455   456   457   458   459   460   461   462   463   464   >>  
t Mrs. Huxley keeps up pretty well. The work which most men have to do is a blessing to them in such cases as yours. God bless you. Sir H. Holland came here to see her, and was wonderfully kind. LETTER 351. TO C. LYELL. Down, November 20th [1860]. I quite agree in admiration of Forbes' Essay (351/1. "Memoir of the Geolog. Survey of the United Kingdom," Volume I., 1846.), yet, on my life, I think it has done, in some respects, as much mischief as good. Those who believe in vast continental extensions will never investigate means of distribution. Good heavens, look at Heer's map of Atlantis! I thought his division and lines of travel of the British plants very wild, and with hardly any foundation. I quite agree with what you say of almost certainty of Glacial epoch having destroyed the Spanish saxifrages, etc., in Ireland. (351/2. See Letter 20.) I remember well discussing this with Hooker; and I suggested that a slightly different or more equable and humid climate might have allowed (with perhaps some extension of land) the plants in question to have grown along the entire western shores between Spain and Ireland, and that subsequently they became extinct, except at the present points under an oceanic climate. The point of Devonshire now has a touch of the same character. I demur in this particular case to Forbes' transportal by ice. The subject has rather gone out of my mind, and it is not worth looking to my MS. discussion on migration during the Glacial period; but I remember that the distribution of mammalia, and the very regular relation of the Alpine plants to points due north (alluded to in "Origin"), seemed to indicate continuous land at close of Glacial period. LETTER 352. TO J.D. HOOKER. Down, March 18th [1861]. I have been recalling my thoughts on the question whether the Glacial period affected the whole world contemporaneously, or only one longitudinal belt after another. To my sorrow my old reasons for rejecting the latter alternative seem to me sufficient, and I should very much like to know what you think. Let us suppose that the cold affected the two Americas either before or after the Old World. Let it advance first either from north or south till the Tropics became slightly cooled, and a few temperate forms reached the Silla of Caracas and the mountains of Brazil. You would say, I suppose, that nearly all the tropical productions would be killed; and that subsequently, after the cold ha
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   426   427   428   429   430   431   432   433   434   435   436   437   438   439   440   441   442   443   444   445   446   447   448   449   450  
451   452   453   454   455   456   457   458   459   460   461   462   463   464   >>  



Top keywords:
Glacial
 

plants

 
period
 

slightly

 
remember
 

suppose

 

Forbes

 
question
 

subsequently

 

affected


distribution
 

Ireland

 

LETTER

 

climate

 

points

 
Alpine
 

alluded

 
relation
 
Origin
 

continuous


regular

 

mammalia

 

character

 

oceanic

 

Devonshire

 

transportal

 

HOOKER

 

discussion

 

migration

 

subject


Tropics
 

cooled

 

temperate

 
Americas
 

advance

 

reached

 

productions

 

tropical

 
killed
 
Caracas

mountains

 

Brazil

 
contemporaneously
 

longitudinal

 

recalling

 

thoughts

 

sorrow

 

sufficient

 

alternative

 

reasons