FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138  
139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   >>   >|  
om human folly and ignorance.[144] By its protest against the conception of the mechanical god who "pushes the universe from without," and by the Spinozistic pantheism which it implicitly proclaims, the ode dismayed the more timid spirits of the time. To the horror of Fritz Jacobi, Lessing, to whom he read it in manuscript in 1780, declared that its conception of the [Greek: hen kai pan] was his own;[145] and when, in 1785, Jacobi published the poem without Goethe's knowledge, a controversy arose in which Lessing was charged with atheism and pantheism, and which, as Goethe records, cost the life of one of the combatants, Moses Mendelssohn.[146] Be it said that in his old age Goethe himself came to regard the sentiments of the soliloquy as _sansculottisch_, and in the time of reaction of the Holy Alliance forbade the publication of the fragment as likely to be received as an evangel by the revolutionary youth of Germany.[147] [Footnote 144: Viktor Hehn pointed out that the drama and the ode are inspired by different motives, and that it was in forgetfulness that Goethe associated them.--_Ueber Goethe's Gedichte_, p. 160. Bielschowsky (_Goethe, Sein Leben und Seine Werke_, i. 510) suggests that the ode may have been intended as the opening of Act ii.] [Footnote 145: Sir Frederick Pollock dates "modern Spinozism" from this incident.--_Spinoza: His Life and Opinions_ (London, 1880), p. 390.] [Footnote 146: While writing a defence of his friend Lessing against the charge of atheism, Mendelssohn's mental agitation was such that it was believed to have occasioned his death.] [Footnote 147: Turgenieff relates that on translating passages from _Satyros_ and _Prometheus_ to Flaubert, Edmond de Goncourt, and Daudet, all three were profoundly impressed by the range and power displayed in them.] To the same period as _Prometheus_ belongs another fragment, inspired by an equally grandiose conception, which, like so many others with Goethe, was never to be realised. The theme of the projected drama was to be the career of Mahomet, and in his Autobiography Goethe has indicated the leading ideas it was to embody. Contrary to the prevailing opinion, which had received brilliant expression in Voltaire's play on the same subject, Mahomet was to be represented not as an impostor but as a prophet sincerely convinced of the truth of his message, and inflamed with a disinterested desire to give his countrymen a purer religion--a vi
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138  
139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Goethe

 

Footnote

 

Lessing

 

conception

 

atheism

 

Prometheus

 

Mahomet

 

Mendelssohn

 

inspired

 

received


Jacobi
 

fragment

 

pantheism

 
Daudet
 
translating
 
Goncourt
 

Edmond

 
relates
 

religion

 

Flaubert


passages

 

Satyros

 

believed

 

Spinoza

 

Opinions

 

London

 

incident

 

Pollock

 

modern

 

Spinozism


agitation
 
occasioned
 
mental
 

charge

 

writing

 

defence

 

friend

 

Turgenieff

 
disinterested
 
brilliant

expression

 

inflamed

 
opinion
 

prevailing

 
leading
 

embody

 
Contrary
 

message

 

Voltaire

 
prophet