FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195  
196   197   198   199   200   201   >>  
urth edition in 1805 (besides an American edition in 1802), thus achieving the popularity alluded to by Jeffrey at the beginning of our next review. _Poems_ (1807) Wordsworth's fourth publication, the _Poems_ (1807), included most of the pieces written after the first appearance of the _Lyrical Ballads_. It was likewise his first venture subsequent to the founding of the _Edinburgh Review_. Jeffrey had assailed the theories of the "Lake Poets" (and, incidentally, coined that unfortunate term) in the first number of the _Review_, in an article on Southey's _Thalaba_, and three years later (1805), in criticizing _Madoc_, he again expressed his views on the subject. Now came the first opportunity to deal with the recognized leader of the "Lakers"--the poet whose work most clearly illustrated the poetic theories that Jeffrey deemed pernicious. The article here reprinted from the _Edinburgh Rev._, XI (214-231), of October, 1807, and Jeffrey's review of _The Excursion_, in _ibid._, XXIV (1-30), are perhaps the two most important critiques of their kind. No student of Wordsworth's theory of poetry, as set forth in his various prefaces, can afford to ignore either of these interesting discussions of the subject. (For details, see A.J. George's edition of the _Prefaces_ of Wordsworth, Gates' _Selections_ from Jeffrey, Beers' _Nineteenth Century Romanticism_, Hutchinson's edition of _Lyrical Ballads_, etc.) It was undoubtedly true that Jeffrey, although an able critic, failed to grasp the real significance of the new poetic movement, and to appreciate the influence wrought by the doctrines of the Lake Poets on modern conceptions of poetry. Yet he was far from wrong in many of his criticisms of Wordsworth. While deprecating the latter's theories, it is clear that Jeffrey regarded him as a poet of great power who was being led astray by his perverse practice. The popular conception of Jeffrey as a hectoring and blatant opponent of Wordsworth is not substantiated by the review. The impartial reader must agree with Jeffrey at many points, and if he will take the trouble to collate Jeffrey's quotations with the revised text of Wordsworth, he will learn that the poet did not disdain to take an occasional suggestion for the improvement of his verse. We recognize Wordsworth to-day as the most unequal of English poets. There is little that is common to the inspired bard of _Tintern Abbey_, the _Immortality Ode_ and the nobler _S
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195  
196   197   198   199   200   201   >>  



Top keywords:

Jeffrey

 

Wordsworth

 
edition
 

theories

 
review
 

poetry

 
Edinburgh
 
Review
 

article

 

poetic


Ballads
 
subject
 

Lyrical

 

regarded

 

criticisms

 
deprecating
 

wrought

 

critic

 
failed
 

Romanticism


undoubtedly

 

Century

 
Nineteenth
 

significance

 

modern

 

doctrines

 

conceptions

 
Selections
 
Hutchinson
 

influence


movement

 

points

 

recognize

 
unequal
 
English
 

occasional

 

suggestion

 
improvement
 

Immortality

 

nobler


Tintern

 
common
 

inspired

 
disdain
 

blatant

 
opponent
 

substantiated

 

impartial

 

hectoring

 

conception