FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157  
158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   >>   >|  
y ground. Will you think over this, and some time, either by letter or when we meet, tell me what you think? Also, I want to know whether your _female_ mimetic butterfly is more beautiful and brighter than the male? When next in London I must get you to show me your Kingfishers. My health is a dreadful evil; I failed in half my engagements during this last visit to London.--Believe me, yours very sincerely, C. DARWIN. * * * * * The answer to this letter is missing, but in Vol. II. of "My Life," p. 3, Wallace writes: "On reading this letter I almost at once saw what seemed to be a very easy and probable explanation of the facts. I had then just been preparing for publication (in the _Westminster Review_) my rather elaborate paper on 'Mimicry and Protective Colouring,' and the numerous cases in which specially showy and slow-flying butterflies were known to have a peculiar odour and taste which protected them from the attacks of insect-eating birds and other animals led me at once to suppose that the gaudily coloured caterpillars must have a similar protection. I had just ascertained from Mr. Jenner Weir that one of our common white moths (_Spilosoma menthastri_) would not be eaten by most of the small birds in his aviary, nor by young turkeys. Now, as a _white_ moth is as conspicuous in the dusk as a coloured caterpillar in the daylight, this case seemed to me so much on a par with the other that I felt almost sure my explanation would turn out correct. I at once wrote to Mr. Darwin to this effect." * * * * * _Down, Bromley, Kent, S.E. February 26, 1867._ My dear Wallace,--Bates was quite right, you are the man to apply to in a difficulty. I never heard anything more ingenious than your suggestion, and I hope you may be able to prove it true. That is a splendid fact about the white moths; it warms one's very blood to see a theory thus almost proved to be true.[57] With respect to the beauty of male butterflies, I must as yet think that it is due to sexual selection; there is some evidence that dragonflies are attracted by bright colours; but what leads me to the above belief is so many male Orthoptera and Cicadas having musical instruments. This being the case, the analogy of birds makes me believe in sexual selection with respect to colour in insects. I wish I had strength and
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157  
158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

letter

 

respect

 

sexual

 

explanation

 

coloured

 

butterflies

 
selection
 

Wallace

 
London
 
conspicuous

February

 
correct
 
aviary
 

daylight

 
caterpillar
 

turkeys

 
Darwin
 

effect

 
Bromley
 

belief


Orthoptera

 
colours
 

bright

 

evidence

 

dragonflies

 

attracted

 

Cicadas

 

colour

 

insects

 

strength


analogy

 

musical

 

instruments

 
beauty
 
suggestion
 

ingenious

 

difficulty

 

splendid

 

theory

 

proved


insect

 

Believe

 
engagements
 

health

 
dreadful
 
failed
 

sincerely

 
writes
 
DARWIN
 

answer