FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156  
157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   >>   >|  
but no such phenomena as in the Papilionidae.--With best wishes, believe me, my dear Darwin, yours very faithfully, ALFRED R. WALLACE. * * * * * _6 Queen Anne Street, W. Monday, January, 1867._ My dear Wallace,--I return by this post the _Journal_.[56] Your resume of glacier action seems to me very good, and has interested my brother much, and as the subject is new to him he is a better judge. That is quite a new and perplexing point which you specify about the freshwater fishes during the glacial period. I have also been very glad to see the article on Lyell, which seems to me to be done by some good man. I forgot to say when with you--but I then indeed did not know so much as I do now--that the sexual, i.e. _ornamental_, differences in fishes, which differences are sometimes very great, offer a difficulty in the wide extension of the view that the female is not brightly coloured on account of the danger which she would incur in the propagation of the species. I very much enjoyed my long conversation with you; and to-day we return home, and I to my horrid dull work of correcting proof-sheets.--Believe me, my dear Wallace, yours very sincerely, CHARLES DARWIN. P.S.--I had arranged to go and see your collection on Saturday evening, but my head suddenly failed after luncheon, and I was forced to lie down all the rest of the day. * * * * * _Down, Bromley, Kent, S.E. February 23, 1867._ Dear Wallace,--I much regretted that I was unable to call on you, but after Monday I was unable even to leave the house. On Monday evening I called on Bates and put a difficulty before him, which he could not answer, and, as on some former similar occasion, his first suggestion was, "You had better ask Wallace." My difficulty is, why are caterpillars sometimes so beautifully and artistically coloured? Seeing that many are coloured to escape danger, I can hardly attribute their bright colour in other cases to mere physical conditions. Bates says the most gaudy caterpillar he ever saw in Amazonia (of a Sphinx) was conspicuous at the distance of yards from its black and red colouring whilst feeding on large green leaves. If anyone objected to male butterflies having been made beautiful by sexual selection, and asked why should they not have been made beautiful as well as their caterpillars, what would you answer? I could not answer, but should maintain m
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156  
157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Wallace

 

answer

 

Monday

 

difficulty

 

coloured

 

danger

 
sexual
 

caterpillars

 
differences
 
fishes

return

 
beautiful
 
evening
 

unable

 
forced
 

occasion

 
suggestion
 

failed

 
suddenly
 

luncheon


regretted

 
called
 

February

 

Bromley

 

similar

 

feeding

 

whilst

 

leaves

 

colouring

 

maintain


selection

 

objected

 

butterflies

 
distance
 
bright
 

attribute

 

colour

 

artistically

 

Seeing

 

escape


physical

 

Amazonia

 
Sphinx
 

conspicuous

 
caterpillar
 
conditions
 

beautifully

 
propagation
 
subject
 

brother