FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130  
131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   >>   >|  
utterflies as well as with female birds. I have a good many facts which make me believe in sexual selection as applied to man, but whether I shall convince anyone else is very doubtful.--Dear Wallace, yours very sincerely, CH. DARWIN. * * * * * LETTER VIII C. DARWIN TO A.R. WALLACE _Down, Bromley, Kent. May 18, 1860._ My dear Mr. Wallace,--I received this morning your letter from Amboyna dated Feb. 16th, containing some remarks and your too high approbation of my book. Your letter has pleased me very much, and I most completely agree with you on the parts which are strongest and which are weakest. The imperfection of the geological record is, as you say, the weakest of all; but yet I am pleased to find that there are almost more geological converts than of pursuers of other branches of natural science. I may mention Lyell, Ramsay, Jukes, Rogers, Keyerling, all good men and true. Pictet of Geneva is not a convert, but is evidently staggered (as I think is Bronn of Heidelberg), and he has written a perfectly fair review in the _Bib. Universelle_ of Geneva. Old Bronn has translated my book, well done also into German, and his well-known name will give it circulation. I think geologists are more converted than simple naturalists because more accustomed to reasoning. Before telling you about the progress of opinion on the subject, you must let me say how I admire the generous manner in which you speak of my book: most persons would in your position have felt bitter envy and jealousy. How nobly free you seem to be of this common failing of mankind. But you speak far too modestly of yourself; you would, if you had had my leisure, have done the work just as well, perhaps better, than I have done it. Talking of envy, you never read anything more envious and spiteful (with numerous misrepresentations) than Owen is in the _Edinburgh Review_. I must give one instance; he throws doubts and sneers at my saying that the ovigerous frena of cirripedes have been converted into branchiae, because I have not found them to be branchiae; whereas _he himself_ admits, before I wrote on cirripedes, without the least hesitation, that their organs are branchiae. The attacks have been heavy and incessant of late. Sedgwick and Prof. Clarke attacked me savagely at the Cambridge Philosophical Society, but Henslow defended me well, though not a convert. Phillips has since attacked me in a lecture at Cam
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130  
131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

branchiae

 

geological

 

attacked

 

pleased

 

weakest

 

convert

 
converted
 

letter

 
Geneva
 
cirripedes

Wallace

 
DARWIN
 
position
 

naturalists

 
incessant
 

admits

 
lecture
 

persons

 
bitter
 

common


failing

 
mankind
 

jealousy

 

organs

 

progress

 

telling

 

accustomed

 

reasoning

 

Before

 

opinion


subject

 

manner

 

hesitation

 
generous
 
admire
 

attacks

 

simple

 

Cambridge

 

savagely

 

spiteful


envious

 

Philosophical

 
ovigerous
 

numerous

 
instance
 
throws
 

doubts

 
sneers
 
Review
 

misrepresentations