FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193  
194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   >>  
lly echoed by Elbridge Gerry of Massachusetts, afterwards Vice-President, who said:-- "It appears to me that the States never were independent. They had only corporate rights." Better words still fell from Mr. Wilson of Pennsylvania, known afterwards as a learned judge of the Supreme Court, and also for his Lectures on Law:-- "Will a regard to State rights justify the sacrifice of the rights of men? If we proceed on any other foundation than the last, our building will neither be solid or lasting." The argument was unanswerable then. It is unanswerable now. Do not elevate the sovereignty of the States against the Constitution of the United States. It is hardly less odious than the early pretension of sovereign power against Magna Charta, according to the memorable words of Lord Coke, as recorded by Rushworth:-- "Sovereign power is no Parliamentary word. In my opinion, it weakens Magna Charta and all our statutes; for they are absolute without any saving of sovereign power. And shall we now add it, we shall weaken the foundation of law, and then the building must needs fall. Take we heed what we yield unto. _Magna Charta is such a fellow that he will have no sovereign._"[17] But the Constitution is our Magna Charta, which can bear no sovereign but itself, as you will see at once, if you will consider its character. And this practical truth was recognized at its formation, as may be seen in the writings of our Rushworth,--I refer to Nathan Dane, who was a member of Congress under the Confederation. He tells us plainly, that the terms "sovereign States," "State sovereignty," "State rights," "rights of States," are not "constitutional expressions." POWERS OF CONGRESS. In the exercise of its sovereignty Congress in intrusted with large and peculiar powers. Take notice of them, and you will see how little of "sovereignty" is left to the States. Their simple enumeration is an argument against the pretension of State Rights. Congress may lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts, and excises, to pay the debts and _provide for the common defence and general welfare of the United States_. It may borrow money on the credit of the United States; regulate commerce with foreign nations, and _among the several States_, and with the Indian tribes; establish a uniform rule of naturalization, and uniform laws on the subject of bankruptcy, _throughout the United States_; coin money, regulate the value thereof, and fix the
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193  
194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   >>  



Top keywords:
States
 

sovereign

 

rights

 

Charta

 

sovereignty

 
United
 
Congress
 

uniform

 

foundation

 
regulate

building

 

unanswerable

 
argument
 

Rushworth

 

pretension

 
Constitution
 

expressions

 
POWERS
 

constitutional

 
plainly

CONGRESS

 

powers

 

notice

 
peculiar
 
exercise
 

intrusted

 

Elbridge

 
Confederation
 
practical
 

recognized


character

 
formation
 

member

 

Nathan

 
Massachusetts
 

writings

 

Indian

 

tribes

 

establish

 
nations

echoed

 
commerce
 

foreign

 

thereof

 

bankruptcy

 

naturalization

 

subject

 

credit

 

borrow

 
Rights