FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52  
53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   >>   >|  
claim is inconsistent with the principles of international law, and is, therefore, not binding upon the court. "If the prize court declines to accept his contentions, and if, after such a decision has been upheld on appeal by the judicial committee of His Majesty's Privy Council, the Government of the United States considers that there is serious ground for holding that the decision is incorrect and infringes the rights of their citizens, it is open to them to claim that it should be subjected to review by an international tribunal." One complaint of the United States, made on July 15, 1915, had been specifically directed to the action of the British naval authorities in seizing the American steamer _Neches_, sailing from Rotterdam to an American port, with a general cargo. The ground advanced to sustain this action was that the goods originated in part at least in Belgium, and hence came within the Order in Council of March 11, 1915, which stipulated that every merchant vessel sailing from a port other than a German port, carrying goods of enemy origin, might be required to discharge such goods in a British or allied port. The _Neches_ had been detained at the Downs and then brought to London. Belgian goods were viewed as being of "enemy origin," because coming from territory held by Germany. This was the first specific case of the kind arising under British Orders in Council affecting American interests, the goods being consigned to United States citizens. Great Britain on July 31, 1915, justified her seizure of the _Neches_ as coming within the application of her extended blockade, as previously set forth, which with great pains she had sought to prove to the United States was permissible, under international law. Her defense in the _Neches_ case, however, was viewed as weakened by her citing Germany's violations of international law to excuse her extension of old blockade principles to the peculiar circumstances of the present war. In intimating that so long as neutrals tolerated the German submarine warfare, they ought not to press her to abandon blockade measures that were a consequence of that warfare, Great Britain was regarded as lowering her defense toward the level of the position taken by Germany. Sir Edward Grey's plan was thus phrased: "His Majesty's Government are not aware, except from the published correspondence between the United States and Germany, to what extent reparation has been claimed f
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52  
53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

United

 
States
 
Germany
 

international

 

Neches

 

blockade

 

Council

 

British

 
American
 

action


citizens
 
German
 

defense

 

warfare

 

sailing

 

origin

 

Britain

 
viewed
 

decision

 

principles


coming

 
ground
 
Government
 

Majesty

 

application

 

extended

 
seizure
 

justified

 

weakened

 

specific


affecting

 

interests

 

Orders

 

consigned

 

arising

 

sought

 

previously

 

permissible

 
phrased
 

Edward


position

 

extent

 

reparation

 
claimed
 
published
 
correspondence
 

lowering

 

regarded

 

present

 

intimating