FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257  
258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   >>   >|  
him; if he would speak to him alone, without the knowledge of any one, and with care lay all before him, easily would he amend his failings; _for the confession of sins is the absolution of crimes_."(453) St. Jerome writes: "If the serpent, the devil, secretly bite a man and thus infect him with the poison of sin, and this man shall remain silent, and do not penance, nor be willing to make known his wound to his brother and master; the master, who has a tongue that can heal, cannot easily serve him. For if the ailing man be ashamed to open his case to the physician no cure can be expected; for medicine does not cure that of which it knows nothing."(454) Elsewhere he says: "With us the Bishop or Priest binds or looses--not them who are merely innocent or guilty--but _having heard, as his duty requires, the various qualities of sin_ he understands who should be bound and who loosed."(455) Could the Catholic doctrine regarding the power of the Priests and the obligation of confession be expressed in stronger language than this? And yet these are the very Fathers who are represented to be opposed to Sacramental Confession! With a reckless disregard of the unanimous voice of antiquity our adversaries have the hardihood to assert that private or Sacramental Confession was introduced at a period subsequent to the twelfth century. They do not, however, vouchsafe to inform us by what Pope or Bishop or Father of the Church, or by what Council, or in what country, this monstrous innovation was foisted on the Christian Republic. Surely, an institution which, in their estimation, has been fraught with such dire calamity to Christendom, ought to have its origin marked with more precision. It is sometimes prudent, however, not to be too particular in fixing dates. I shall now, I trust, show to the satisfaction of the reader: First--That Sacramental Confession was not introduced. Second--That it could not have been introduced into the Church since the days of the Apostles, and consequently that it is Apostolic in its origin. That Confession was not invented since the days of the Apostles is manifest as soon as we attempt to fix the period of its first establishment. Let us go back, step, by step, from the nineteenth to the first century. It had not its origin in the present century, as everybody will admit. Nor did it arise in the sixteenth century, since the General Council of Trent, held in that age, speaks of it as
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257  
258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

century

 

Confession

 

Sacramental

 

introduced

 

origin

 

Apostles

 

Bishop

 

master

 

easily

 

period


confession

 

Church

 

Council

 
subsequent
 

fraught

 

assert

 
Christendom
 
private
 

adversaries

 

hardihood


calamity

 

institution

 
foisted
 

Christian

 

Father

 

country

 

innovation

 

inform

 

vouchsafe

 

monstrous


twelfth

 

Surely

 

Republic

 

estimation

 

satisfaction

 

nineteenth

 

present

 

attempt

 

establishment

 

speaks


General

 

sixteenth

 

fixing

 
precision
 

prudent

 

Apostolic

 

invented

 

manifest

 
reader
 
Second