FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277  
278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   >>   >|  
nd practised, and which the primitive Church enforced? The Church, as every one must know who is acquainted with her history, never exempts her children from the obligation of doing works of penance. No one can deny that the practices of mortification are more frequent among Catholics than among Protestants. Where will you find the evangelical duty of fasting enforced, if not from the Catholic pulpit? It is well known that, among the members of the Catholic Church, those who avail themselves of the boon of Indulgences are usually her most practical, edifying and fervent children. Their spiritual growth far from being retarded, is quickened by the aid of Indulgences, which are usually accompanied by acts of contrition, devotion, self-denial and the reception of the Sacraments. But, do what we will, we cannot please our opponents. If we fast and give alms; if we crucify our flesh, and make pilgrimages and perform other works of penance, we are accused of clinging to the rags of dead works, instead of "holding on to Jesus" by faith. If, on the other hand, we enrich our souls with the treasures of Indulgences we are charged with relying on the vicarious merits of others and of lightening too much the salutary burden of the cross. But how can Protestants consistently find fault with the Church for _mitigating_ the austerities of penance, since their own fundamental principle rests on _faith alone without good works_? But have not Indulgences been the occasion of many abuses at various times, particularly in the sixteenth century? I will not deny that Indulgences have been abused; but are not the most sacred things liable to be perverted? This is a proper place to refer briefly to the Bull of Pope Leo X. proclaiming the Indulgence which afforded Luther a pretext for his apostasy. Leo determined to bring to completion the magnificent Church of St. Peter, commenced by his predecessor, Julius II. With that view he issued a Bull promulgating an Indulgence to such as would contribute some voluntary offering toward the erection of the grand cathedral. Those, however, who contributed nothing shared equally in the treasury of the Church, provided they complied with the essential conditions for gaining the Indulgence. The only indispensable conditions enjoined by the Papal Bull were sincere repentance and confession of sins. D'Aubigne admits this truth, though in a faltering manner, when he observes that "in the Pope's Bull so
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277  
278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Church

 

Indulgences

 

penance

 

Indulgence

 
Catholic
 

conditions

 

Protestants

 
children
 

enforced

 
pretext

proclaiming

 
occasion
 

Luther

 

afforded

 
determined
 

magnificent

 

completion

 

apostasy

 

abused

 

century


perverted

 

things

 

sacred

 
proper
 

liable

 

abuses

 
briefly
 

sixteenth

 

sincere

 

repentance


confession

 

enjoined

 

indispensable

 

complied

 
essential
 

gaining

 
manner
 

observes

 

faltering

 
Aubigne

admits

 

provided

 
treasury
 

promulgating

 
contribute
 

issued

 
predecessor
 
Julius
 

voluntary

 
contributed