FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39  
40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   >>   >|  
be heard upon the subject it would be expedient to give an intimation to the Secretary. Prof. ABBE, Delegate of the United States, then said: I have been requested to present to the Conference the communication that I hold in my hand, and in doing so wish to offer the following resolution: "Whereas several persons desire to submit to this Conference inventions, devices, and systems of universal time: therefore, "_Resolved_, That the Conference will acknowledge the receipt of such communications, but will abstain from any expression of opinion as to their respective merits." Professor ADAMS, Delegate of Great Britain, said that the Conference should be very cautious in admitting the devices and schemes of people who have no connection with this body; that there are, no doubt, many inventors and many people who have plans and schemes which they wish to press upon the Conference, and that it was probable that the Conference would be subjected to very great inconvenience if they took upon themselves even the burden of acknowledging the receipt of these communications. The PRESIDENT stated that he had received several Communions of this character, one proposing that Jerusalem should be taken as the prime meridian. Mr. LEFAIVRE, Delegate of France, proposed that the Conference should appoint a committee to examine the different papers submitted by outside parties, and to make such suggestions as they might deem proper after examining the papers. Mr. VALERA, Delegate of Spain, said that it seemed to him the proper course of proceeding for the Conference was to take up the subject article by article, and treat it in that order; that there were presented to the Conference certain well-defined propositions, and that besides these there were the resolutions which had been adopted by the Conference at Rome, which could be used as a basis for the discussions of this Conference; that in that way the Delegates would have before them some precise subject-matter, and after discussion, if any proposition needed to be altered or amended it would be in the power of the Conference to do so, but that unless some regular method of proceeding were adopted the sessions would be prolonged indefinitely, and the Conference would be confused by a multitude of irrelevant propositions that might be presented to them. Mr. RUTHERFURD, Delegate of the United States, stated that it seemed to him that to i
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39  
40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Conference

 
Delegate
 

subject

 
article
 

schemes

 

receipt

 

people

 

adopted

 

presented

 

propositions


proper

 

stated

 
papers
 

proceeding

 

communications

 

devices

 
States
 

United

 
prolonged
 

suggestions


parties
 

sessions

 

VALERA

 

method

 

examining

 

committee

 

appoint

 

proposed

 

LEFAIVRE

 

France


examine

 

confused

 

regular

 
multitude
 
submitted
 

RUTHERFURD

 

irrelevant

 
indefinitely
 

resolutions

 

defined


Delegates

 

discussions

 

precise

 

amended

 

altered

 
discussion
 

matter

 
proposition
 

needed

 

subjected