FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39  
40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   >>   >|  
be heard upon the subject it would be expedient to give an intimation to the Secretary. Prof. ABBE, Delegate of the United States, then said: I have been requested to present to the Conference the communication that I hold in my hand, and in doing so wish to offer the following resolution: "Whereas several persons desire to submit to this Conference inventions, devices, and systems of universal time: therefore, "_Resolved_, That the Conference will acknowledge the receipt of such communications, but will abstain from any expression of opinion as to their respective merits." Professor ADAMS, Delegate of Great Britain, said that the Conference should be very cautious in admitting the devices and schemes of people who have no connection with this body; that there are, no doubt, many inventors and many people who have plans and schemes which they wish to press upon the Conference, and that it was probable that the Conference would be subjected to very great inconvenience if they took upon themselves even the burden of acknowledging the receipt of these communications. The PRESIDENT stated that he had received several Communions of this character, one proposing that Jerusalem should be taken as the prime meridian. Mr. LEFAIVRE, Delegate of France, proposed that the Conference should appoint a committee to examine the different papers submitted by outside parties, and to make such suggestions as they might deem proper after examining the papers. Mr. VALERA, Delegate of Spain, said that it seemed to him the proper course of proceeding for the Conference was to take up the subject article by article, and treat it in that order; that there were presented to the Conference certain well-defined propositions, and that besides these there were the resolutions which had been adopted by the Conference at Rome, which could be used as a basis for the discussions of this Conference; that in that way the Delegates would have before them some precise subject-matter, and after discussion, if any proposition needed to be altered or amended it would be in the power of the Conference to do so, but that unless some regular method of proceeding were adopted the sessions would be prolonged indefinitely, and the Conference would be confused by a multitude of irrelevant propositions that might be presented to them. Mr. RUTHERFURD, Delegate of the United States, stated that it seemed to him that to i
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39  
40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Conference

 

Delegate

 
subject
 

article

 

schemes

 
receipt
 

people

 

adopted

 

presented

 
propositions

proper

 
stated
 

papers

 

proceeding

 

communications

 
devices
 

States

 

United

 

prolonged

 

suggestions


parties
 

sessions

 
VALERA
 

method

 

examining

 

committee

 

appoint

 
proposed
 

LEFAIVRE

 

France


examine
 
confused
 

regular

 
multitude
 

submitted

 

RUTHERFURD

 

irrelevant

 

indefinitely

 
resolutions
 
defined

Delegates

 

discussions

 

precise

 

amended

 
altered
 

discussion

 

matter

 

proposition

 
needed
 

subjected