FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37  
38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   >>  
en only the other day 'cinematograph' made its not wholly desirable appearance, it made no claim to a long vowel in either of its two first syllables. Not till it was reasonably shortened into 'c[)i]n[)e]ma' did a Judge from the Bench make a lawless decree for a long second vowel, and even he left the _i_ short though it is long in Greek. Of course with the manner of speech the quantities had to be learnt separately. The task was not as difficult as some may think. To boys with a taste for making verses the thumbing of a Gradus (I hope that no one calls it a Gr[)a]dus) was always a delightful occupation, and a quantity once learnt was seldom forgotten. It must be admitted that, as boys were forced to do verses, whether they could or not, there were always some who could read and yet forget. Although these usages did not precede but followed the pronunciation of words already borrowed from Latin, we may use them to classify the changes of quantity. We shall see that although there are some exceptions for which it is difficult to give a reason, yet most of the exceptions fall under two classes. When words came to us through French, the pronunciation was often affected by the French form of the word. Thus the adjective 'present' would, if it had come direct from Latin, have had a long vowel in the first syllable. To an English ear 'pr[)e]sent' seemed nearer than 'pr[=e]sent' to the French 'pr['e]sent'. The _N.E.D._ says that 'gladiator' comes straight from the Latin 'gladiatorem'. Surely in that case it would have had its first vowel long, as in 'radiator' and 'mediator'. In any case its pronunciation must have been affected by 'gladiateur'. The other class of exceptions consists of words deliberately introduced by writers at a late period. Thus 'adorable' began as a penman's word. Following 'in['e]xorable' and the like it should have been '['a]dorable'. Actually it was formed by adding _-able_ to 'ad['o]re', like 'laughable'. It is now too stiff in the joints to think of a change, and must continue to figure with the other sins of the Restoration. Before dealing with the words as classified by their formation, we may make short lists of typical words to show that for the pronunciation of English derivatives it is idle to refer to the classical quantities. From _[=[ae]]_: [)e]difice, [)e]mulate, c[)e]rulean, qu[)e]stion. From _[=oe]_: [)e]conomy, [)e]cumenical, conf[)e]derate. From _[=a]_,: don[)a]tive, n[)a]t
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37  
38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   >>  



Top keywords:

pronunciation

 

exceptions

 

French

 

difficult

 

learnt

 

verses

 

quantity

 

quantities

 

affected

 

English


introduced
 

writers

 

adorable

 
consists
 

deliberately

 

period

 

nearer

 

gladiatorem

 
straight
 

syllable


Surely

 

mediator

 
gladiator
 

radiator

 

direct

 
gladiateur
 

derivatives

 

classical

 

typical

 

classified


formation
 

difice

 
mulate
 
derate
 

cumenical

 

conomy

 

rulean

 

dealing

 

Before

 

formed


Actually
 

adding

 

dorable

 

penman

 
Following
 

xorable

 

continue

 

figure

 

Restoration

 
change