FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63  
64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   >>   >|  
h of course ought by rights to make the whole question _res judicata_. But it has done nothing of the kind. Could we really ask Blount and Jaggard how they came by the manuscripts, and who made the corrections, and did we believe their replies, why, then a stray Baconian here and there might reluctantly abandon his strange fancy; but as _Hall v. Russell_ is Judge Willis's joke, it will convert no Baconians any more than Dean Sherlock's once celebrated _Trial of the Witnesses_ compels belief in the Resurrection. The question in reality is a compound one. Did Shakespeare write the plays? If yes, the matter is at rest. If no--who did? If an author can be found--Bacon or anyone else--well and good. If no author can be found--Anon. wrote them--a conclusion which need terrify no one, since the plays would still remain within our reach, and William Shakespeare, apart from the plays, is very little to anybody who has not written his life. But this is not the form the controversy has assumed. The anti-Shakespeareans are to a man Baconians, and fondly imagine that if only Will Shakespeare were put out of the way their man must step into the vacant throne. Lord Penzance in charging his jury told them that those of their number 'who had studied the writings of Bacon' and were 'keenly alive to his marvellous mental powers' would probably have 'no difficulty,' if once satisfied that the author they were seeking after was _not_ Shakespeare, in finding as a fact that he _was_ Bacon. But suppose James Spedding had been on that jury, and, rising in his place, had spoken as follows: 'My Lord,--If any man has ever studied the writings of Bacon, I have. For twenty-five years I have done little else. If any man is keenly alive to his marvellous mental powers, I am that man. I am also deeply read in the plays attributed to Shakespeare, and I think I am in a condition to say that, whoever was the real author, it was _not_ Bacon.' That this is exactly what Spedding would have said we know from the letter he wrote on the subject to Mr. Holmes, reprinted in _Essays and Discussions_, and it completely upsets the whole scheme of arrangement of Lord Penzance's summing-up, which proceeds on the easy footing that the more difficulties you throw in Shakespeare's path the smoother becomes Bacon's. That there are difficulties in Shakespeare's path, some things very hard to explain, must be admitted. Lord Penzance makes the
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63  
64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Shakespeare
 

author

 

Penzance

 

Spedding

 
marvellous
 
mental
 

keenly

 
powers
 

writings

 

studied


Baconians

 

question

 
difficulties
 

footing

 
seeking
 
scheme
 

satisfied

 

difficulty

 
summing
 

arrangement


proceeds

 

throne

 

admitted

 
explain
 

vacant

 
things
 

number

 

charging

 

smoother

 

upsets


spoken

 

twenty

 
deeply
 

attributed

 

condition

 

Essays

 
suppose
 
reprinted
 

Discussions

 

completely


finding

 

Holmes

 

rising

 

letter

 
subject
 

abandon

 
strange
 

reluctantly

 
Baconian
 

convert