FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   499   500   501   502   503   504   505   506   507   508   509   510   511   512   513   514   515   516   517   518   519   520   521   522   523  
524   525   526   527   528   529   530   531   532   533   534   535   536   537   538   539   540   541   542   543   544   545   546   547   548   >>   >|  
aven, came from thence; and that famous stone that fell from heaven in Aristotle's time, olymp. 84, _anno tertio, ad Capuas Fluenta_, recorded by Laertius and others, or Ancile or buckler in Numa's time, recorded by Festus. We may likewise insert with Campanella and Brunus, that which Pythagoras, Aristarchus, Samius, Heraclitus, Epicurus, Melissus, Democritus, Leucippus maintained in their ages, there be [3110]infinite worlds, and infinite earths or systems, _in infinito aethere_, which [3111]Eusebius collects out of their tenets, because infinite stars and planets like unto this of ours, which some stick not still to maintain and publicly defend, _sperabundus expecto innumerabilium mundorum in aeternitate per ambulationem_, &c. (Nic. Hill. Londinensis _philos. Epicur._) For if the firmament be of such an incomparable bigness, as these Copernical giants will have it, _infinitum, aut infinito proximum_, so vast and full of innumerable stars, as being infinite in extent, one above another, some higher, some lower, some nearer, some farther off, and so far asunder, and those so huge and great, insomuch that if the whole sphere of Saturn, and all that is included in it, _totum aggregatum_ (as Fromundus of Louvain in his tract, _de immobilitate terrae_ argues) _evehatur inter stellas, videri a nobis non poterat, tam immanis est distantia inter tellurem et fixas, sed instar puncti_, &c. If our world be small in respect, why may we not suppose a plurality of worlds, those infinite stars visible in the firmament to be so many suns, with particular fixed centres; to have likewise their subordinate planets, as the sun hath his dancing still round him? which Cardinal Cusanus, Walkarinus, Brunus, and some others have held, and some still maintain, _Animae, Aristotelismo innutritae, et minutis speculationibus assuetae, secus forsan_, &c. Though they seem close to us, they are infinitely distant, and so _per consequens_, there are infinite habitable worlds: what hinders? Why should not an infinite cause (as God is) produce infinite effects? as Nic. Hill. _Democrit. philos._ disputes: Kepler (I confess) will by no means admit of Brunus's infinite worlds, or that the fixed stars should be so many suns, with their compassing planets, yet the said [3112]Kepler between jest and earnest in his perspectives, lunar geography, [3113] & _somnio suo, dissertat. cum nunc. sider._ seems in part to agree with this, and partly to contradict; for the p
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   499   500   501   502   503   504   505   506   507   508   509   510   511   512   513   514   515   516   517   518   519   520   521   522   523  
524   525   526   527   528   529   530   531   532   533   534   535   536   537   538   539   540   541   542   543   544   545   546   547   548   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

infinite

 

worlds

 
Brunus
 

planets

 

maintain

 
Kepler
 

infinito

 

firmament

 
recorded
 

philos


likewise

 

Walkarinus

 

Cardinal

 

dancing

 
Cusanus
 

suppose

 

distantia

 

tellurem

 

immanis

 

videri


stellas

 

poterat

 

instar

 

puncti

 

visible

 

plurality

 

centres

 

subordinate

 

respect

 
partly

compassing

 

disputes

 

confess

 
earnest
 
dissertat
 
contradict
 

somnio

 

perspectives

 
geography
 

Democrit


effects

 
forsan
 
Though
 
assuetae
 

speculationibus

 

Animae

 
Aristotelismo
 

innutritae

 

minutis

 

hinders