FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   >>  
or in each treaty port are the foreign concessions already mentioned--German, Austrian, British, French, Russian. And in these concessions, opium may be procured. Simply by crossing an imaginary line, in such cities as Shanghai and Hongkong, can the Chinese buy as much opium as they choose. China will never be rid of this menace till she is rid of these extraterritorial holdings. Opium shops, licensed by foreign governments, are always ready to supply her people with the forbidden drug. We say that the China market is closed. So it is, in one way. But the British Opium Monopoly is not ended. The year 1917 saw a tremendous blow dealt to the British opium dealers, but other markets will be found. There are other countries than China whose inhabitants can be taught this vice. The object of this discussion is to consider these other countries, and to see to what extent the world is menaced by this possibility. XVI CONCLUSION There are many people who advocate the use of opium, and who defend the policy of the Opium Monopoly. They argue that it is not harmful--if taken in moderation. They even assert that it is no more objectionable than alcohol or tobacco. Leaving out of account, therefore, the consensus of opinion of the medical profession as to the evils of habit-forming drugs, and accepting the theory that opium is harmless, we should then like to ask why the use of opium is so carefully restricted to the peoples of subject states, who have no voice in their own affairs? Why should the benefits of opium be confined to Oriental races, and why should not the white race be given the same opportunities for indulgence? Is there any reason for this discrimination? As a source of revenue, it certainly has advantages. Yet curiously enough, those European countries which derive much profit through the sale of opium to their subject races, seem to have an aversion to introducing it to their people at home. And there is a further coincidence in the fact that none of the self-governing colonies of European countries--Australia, New Zealand and Canada--permit this traffic. It appears to be only the subject peoples, whose well-being has become the White Man's Burden, who receive the blessings of this peculiar form of altruism. Is it because the white race is worth preserving, worth protecting, and because subject nations are fair game for exploitation of any kind? Another argument advanced by advocates of Governmen
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   >>  



Top keywords:

countries

 

subject

 

people

 

British

 

peoples

 

European

 
foreign
 

concessions

 

Monopoly

 

reason


advantages
 

source

 

revenue

 

discrimination

 

benefits

 

carefully

 

restricted

 

theory

 
harmless
 

states


Oriental

 
opportunities
 

confined

 

curiously

 

affairs

 
indulgence
 

receive

 
Burden
 

blessings

 

peculiar


altruism

 

preserving

 

argument

 

Another

 

advanced

 

advocates

 

Governmen

 
exploitation
 

protecting

 

nations


appears
 
aversion
 

introducing

 
derive
 
profit
 
accepting
 

coincidence

 

Zealand

 

Canada

 

permit