FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159  
160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   >>   >|  
tence. In primitive times therefore, man lived in families, on the produce of the chase. Later on, the spirit of discovery, the more abundant food obtained by traps and by the cultivation of plants allowed men to live in tribes. Thus, intellectual development was the first cause of social life in man, and Lubbock is certainly wrong in considering that the establishment of clans dates further back than the first beginning of civilization. Westermark's conclusions are as follows: (1). _At no period of human existence has family life been replaced by clan life._ (2). _Conjugal life is a heritage from ancestors who lived in a similar way to the anthropoid apes of the present day._ (3). _Although less intimately and less constantly bound to the children than to the mother, the father has always been in man the protector of the family._ CRITICISM OF THE DOCTRINE OF PROMISCUITY Most sociologists believe with Lubbock, Bachofen, MacLennan, Bastian, Giraud-Teulon, Wilkens, and others that primitive man lived in sexual promiscuity. If we agree with Westermark that the term marriage includes polygamy, polyandry and limited marriage, the opinion of these authors is wrong. What they have considered as promiscuity can always be included in one of these forms of marriage, even among the indigenes of Hayti, whose life is the most debauched. The author who has most confused the question is Fison, with his dogmatic theories concerning the Australians. Obliged to admit that promiscuity does not exist among these people, he still maintains that it existed formerly. Curr, who was better acquainted than Fison with the Australians, has proved that they are normally monogamous. Similar statements of Bastian, Wilkens and others concerning the Kustchins, the natives of Terra del Fuego, are also incorrect. In none of the African tribes is there communion of women, the men, on the other hand, are extremely jealous. Promiscuity is not observed among savage and primitive races, but among people already civilized, such as the Buddhist Butias, in whom man knows neither honor nor jealousy. The savage Weddas are monogamous, and one of their proverbs says: "Death alone can separate woman from man." There is in reality only one true form of promiscuity--the prostitution of modern civilized races, who have introduced it among savages, subjecting them to gratify their own lust. Among many savage races there exists, on the contrary, a very
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159  
160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

promiscuity

 

marriage

 
primitive
 

savage

 

Westermark

 

civilized

 

Bastian

 

Australians

 

monogamous

 
Wilkens

people
 

family

 

Lubbock

 
tribes
 
modern
 

introduced

 

prostitution

 
acquainted
 

existed

 
maintains

reality

 
Obliged
 
confused
 

question

 

author

 

exists

 
debauched
 

contrary

 

subjecting

 
proved

savages
 

theories

 

gratify

 

dogmatic

 

proverbs

 

observed

 

extremely

 

jealous

 

Promiscuity

 
Butias

Buddhist
 
Weddas
 

jealousy

 

natives

 

Kustchins

 
statements
 

Similar

 

separate

 

communion

 

African