FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224  
225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   >>   >|  
at Trajan, Pliny, Tacitus, the Antonines, Celsus, Lucian and the like,--much more the ten thousand philosophers and joke-smiths of Rome,--did both feel and apply all this to the Galilean Sect; and yet--'Vicisti, O Galilaee'! Ib. p. 95. They never fail to refer to the proud Pharisee, whom they term self-'righteous'; and thus, having greatly misrepresented his character, they proceed to declaim on the arrogance of founding any expectation of reward from the performance of our 'moral duties':--whereas the plain truth is that the Pharisee was 'not righteous', but merely arrogated to himself that character; he had neglected all the 'moral duties' of life. Who told the Barrister this? Not the Gospel, I am sure. The Evangelical has only to translate these sentences into the true statement of his opinions, in order to baffle this angry and impotent attack; the self-righteousness of all who expect to claim salvation on the plea of their own personal merit. "Pay to A. B. at sight--value received by me."--To Messrs. Stone and Co. Bankers, Heaven-Gate. It is a short step from this to the Popish. "Pay to A. B. 'or order'." Once assume merits, and I defy you to keep out supererogation and the old 'Monte di Pieta'. Ib. p. 97. --and from thence occasion is taken to defame all those who strive to prepare themselves, during this their state of trial, for that judgment which they must undergo at that day, when they will receive either reward or punishment, according as they shall be found to have 'merited' the one, or 'deserved' the other. Can the Barrister have read the New Testament? Or does he know it only by quotations? Ib. --a swarm of new Evangelists who are every where teaching the people that no reliance is to be placed on holiness of life as a ground of future acceptance. I am weary of repeating that this is false. It is only denied that mere acts, not proceeding from faith, are or can be holiness. As surely (would the Methodist say) as the Holy Ghost proceeds from the Son, so surely does sanctification from redemption, and not vice versa,--much less from self-sanctifiedness, that ostrich with its head in the sand, and the plucked rump of its merits staring on the divine [Greek: Atae] 'venatrix'! Ib. p. 102. 'He that doeth righteousness is righteous'. Since then it is plain that each must 'himself' be righteous, if he be so at all, what do they mean who th
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224  
225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

righteous

 

character

 

surely

 

holiness

 

duties

 

righteousness

 

reward

 
merits
 

Barrister

 

Pharisee


occasion
 
defame
 

strive

 

Testament

 
quotations
 

judgment

 
punishment
 
receive
 

undergo

 

deserved


merited

 

Evangelists

 
prepare
 

plucked

 

staring

 

divine

 
sanctifiedness
 

ostrich

 

venatrix

 
redemption

sanctification

 

acceptance

 

future

 

repeating

 

ground

 
teaching
 
people
 

reliance

 

denied

 

proceeds


Methodist

 

proceeding

 

greatly

 

misrepresented

 

proceed

 

declaim

 
arrogance
 

founding

 

arrogated

 
expectation