FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29  
30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   >>   >|  
tial uniformity; and, although the changes are always extensive, often covering an area of one thousand miles or more, and our vision can not extend in any direction more than from thirty to fifty, yet those changes are always, to a considerable extent, intelligible, and may often be foreseen." "Has meteorology made such progress?" "By no means. It has, indeed, been raised to the dignity of a science, and professorships endowed for its advancement. Some books have been written, and many theories broached in relation to it; and innumerable observations of the states of the barometer and thermometer, of the clouds, and the quantity of fallen rain, and the direction and force of the wind--made and recorded simultaneously in different countries--have been published and compared; and a great many important facts established, and tables of '_means_' constructed, and just inferences drawn, yet the _few and simple arrangements_ upon which all the phenomena depend, and _their philosophy_, have not yet been clearly elicited or understood." "Have not the 'American Association for the Advancement of Science' arrived at some definite and sound conclusion upon the subject?" "No; it has been with them, for many years, an interesting subject for papers and debate. Some very valuable articles, upon particular topics, or branches of the subject, have been read and published. But the _Cyclonologists_, as they term themselves, and who seem to think the great question is, '_Are storms whirlwinds?_' appear with new editions and phases of their favorite views as regularly as the annual meeting recurs; and, though they have not convinced, they seem to have silenced their opponents. The only conclusion, however, judging from their debates, to which the Association appear to have come with any considerable unanimity, is, that they are yet without sufficient _authentic observations_ and well-established facts, to authorize the adoption of the Huttonian, Daltonian, Gyratory, or Aspiratory, or any of the other numerous theories which abound. And they are right. The subject is mystified by these theories and speculations of the study, founded on barometrical and thermometrical records, and the direction and force of the surface winds. "The qualities of heat were among the earlier discoveries of science, and all the phenomena of the weather were forthwith attributed to its influence. Hastily-formed and erroneous views of its power, and the ma
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29  
30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

subject

 

direction

 
theories
 

observations

 

Association

 

science

 

phenomena

 
published
 

considerable

 

established


conclusion

 

editions

 

meeting

 
convinced
 
annual
 

recurs

 

favorite

 
phases
 

regularly

 

storms


Cyclonologists
 

formed

 
branches
 

articles

 

topics

 

silenced

 

whirlwinds

 

Hastily

 

question

 
influence

speculations

 

founded

 

mystified

 
discoveries
 

abound

 
barometrical
 
qualities
 

surface

 

thermometrical

 
records

earlier

 
numerous
 
sufficient
 

authentic

 

unanimity

 

debates

 

attributed

 
judging
 
authorize
 

Daltonian