FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139  
140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   >>   >|  
lled "a clock" or "a tick-tock," and we shall perhaps not be too liberal if we score these responses _plus_. "Pen" for "pencil," however, is unsatisfactory. Substitute names for "key" and "knife" are rarely given. Mispronunciations due to baby-talk are of course ignored. REMARKS. The purpose of this test is to find out whether the child has made the association between familiar objects and their names. The mental processes necessary to enable the child to pass this test are very elementary, and yet, as far as they go, they are fundamental. Learning the names of objects frequently seen is a form of mental activity in which the normally endowed child of 2 to 4 years finds great satisfaction. Any marked retardation in making such associations is a grave indication of the lack of that spontaneity which is so necessary for the development of the higher grades of intelligence. It would be entirely beside the point, therefore, to question the validity of the test on the ground that a given child may not have been _taught_ the names of the objects used. Practically all children 3 years old, however poor their environment, have made the acquaintance of at least three of the five objects, and if intelligence is normal they have learned their names as a result of spontaneous inquiry. Always use the list of objects here given, because it has been standardized. Any improvised selection would be sure to contain some objects either less or more familiar than those in the standardized list. Note also that three correct responses out of five are sufficient. If we required five correct answers out of six (like Kuhlmann), or three out of three (like Binet, Goddard, and Huey), the test would probably belong at the 4-year level. Binet states that this test is materially harder than that of naming objects in a picture, since in the latter the child selects from a number of objects in the picture those he knows best, while in the former test he must name the objects we have arbitrarily chosen. This difference does not hold, however, if we require only three correct responses out of five for passing the test of naming objects, instead of Binet's three out of three. All else being equal, it is of course easier to recognize and name a real object shown than it is to recognize and name it from a picture. III, 3. ENUMERATION OF OBJECTS IN PICTURES PROCEDURE. Use the three pictures designated as "Dutch Home," "River Scene," and "Post-Offi
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139  
140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

objects

 
picture
 

correct

 
responses
 

intelligence

 

familiar

 

mental

 

standardized

 

naming

 

recognize


belong

 

Goddard

 
materially
 

states

 

selection

 

improvised

 
required
 

answers

 
sufficient
 

harder


Kuhlmann
 

chosen

 

ENUMERATION

 

OBJECTS

 

easier

 

object

 

PICTURES

 

PROCEDURE

 

pictures

 

designated


arbitrarily

 

selects

 

number

 
Always
 
passing
 

require

 

difference

 
validity
 

association

 

processes


enable

 

REMARKS

 

purpose

 

Learning

 

frequently

 
fundamental
 

elementary

 
liberal
 

rarely

 

Mispronunciations