FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252  
253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   >>   >|  
rn United States, H. J. Banker found[123] that the number of children declined with each decade. Thus married women graduates prior to the Civil War had 2 surviving children each; in the last decade of the nineteenth century they had only one. For married men graduates, the number of surviving children had fallen in the same length of time from 2.62 to 1.38. When all graduates, married or not, are counted in the decade 1892-1901, it is found that the men of Syracuse have contributed to the next generation one surviving child each, the women only half a child apiece. Dr. Cattell's investigation of the families of 1,000 contemporary American men of science all of which were probably not complete however, shows that they leave, on the average, less than two surviving children. Only one family in 75 is larger than six, and 22% of them are childless. Obviously, as far as those families are concerned, there will be fewer men of inherent scientific eminence in the next generation than in this. The decline in the birth-rate is sometimes attributed to the fact that people as a whole are marrying later than they used to; we have already shown that this idea is, on the whole, false. The idea that people as a whole are marrying less than they used to is also, as we have shown, mistaken. The decline in the general birth-rate can be attributed to only one fact, and that is that married people are having fewer children. The percentage of childless wives in the American stock is steadily increasing. Dr. Crum's figures show the following percentage of childless wives, in the New England genealogies with which he worked: 1750-1799 1.88 1800-1849 4.07 1850-1869 5.91 1870-1879 8.10 J. A. Hill[124] found, from the 1910 census figures, that one in eight of the native-born wives is childless, as compared with one in five among the Negroes, one in nineteen among the foreign born. Childlessness of American wives is therefore a considerable, although not a preponderant factor, in this decline of the birth rate. Dr. Hill further found that from 10 marriages, in various stocks, the following numbers of children could be expected: Native-born women 27 Negro-born women 31 English-born women 34 Russian-born women 54 French Canada-born women 56 Polish-born women 62 The women of the old American stock are on the whole more sterile or, if no
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252  
253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

children

 

surviving

 

married

 
American
 

childless

 
people
 

decline

 

decade

 

graduates

 
generation

percentage

 

number

 

families

 

marrying

 

figures

 

attributed

 

genealogies

 
England
 
worked
 
Childlessness

English

 

Native

 
numbers
 

expected

 

Russian

 

sterile

 

Polish

 
French
 

Canada

 

stocks


native

 

compared

 

census

 

Negroes

 

nineteen

 

preponderant

 

factor

 
marriages
 

considerable

 
foreign

increasing

 

counted

 

length

 

Syracuse

 

investigation

 

contemporary

 

Cattell

 

apiece

 

contributed

 

fallen